Suppr超能文献

年龄并非老年尿失禁患者进行中段尿道吊带手术的限制因素。

Age is not a limiting factor for midurethral sling procedures in the elderly with urinary incontinence.

作者信息

Ku Ja Hyeon, Oh Jin Gyu, Shin Jae Wook, Kim Soo Woong, Paick Jae-Seung

机构信息

Department of Urology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Jongno-gu, Korea.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;61(4):194-9. doi: 10.1159/000091321. Epub 2006 Feb 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The object was to evaluate clinical outcome of the midurethral sling procedures in the elderly compared with middle-aged women.

METHODS

A total of 266 women who underwent midurethral sling procedures with at least follow-up greater than 6 months were included in the study. Patients were divided as the elderly group (65 years old or older, n = 60) and the middle-aged group (45-64 years old, n = 206).

RESULTS

Although postoperative urge symptoms were more prevalent in the elderly group (25.0%) than in the middle-aged group (6.3%), there were no significant differences between the two groups for the rates of postoperative urge incontinence (p = 0.159). Stress incontinence was cured by 91.3% in the middle-aged group and 85.0% in the elderly group, respectively (p = 0.158).

CONCLUSIONS

Age does not seem to be a significant risk factor for failure of midurethral sling procedures.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估与中年女性相比,老年女性行尿道中段吊带术的临床效果。

方法

本研究纳入了266例行尿道中段吊带术且随访时间至少超过6个月的女性患者。患者被分为老年组(65岁及以上,n = 60)和中年组(45 - 64岁,n = 206)。

结果

尽管老年组术后尿急症状的发生率(25.0%)高于中年组(6.3%),但两组术后尿急失禁的发生率无显著差异(p = 0.159)。中年组和老年组的压力性尿失禁治愈率分别为91.3%和85.0%(p = 0.158)。

结论

年龄似乎并非尿道中段吊带术失败的重要危险因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验