van der Meulen Marylee J, Lobbezoo Frank, Aartman Irene H A, Naeije Machiel
Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, Amsterdam (ACTA), Louwesweg 1, 1066 EA Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Orofac Pain. 2006 Winter;20(1):31-5.
To examine the relationship between different types of self-reported oral parafunctions and pain intensity in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMD).
Two cohorts of TMD pain patients, 1 comprising 303 patients and the other comprising 226 patients, completed a 12-item oral parafunctions questionnaire as well as the Research Diagnostic Criteria Axis II questionnaire, which includes a characteristic pain intensity score (CPI). Relationships between oral parafunctions and CPI were examined; age and gender were controlled for. The effects of phrasing of the oral parafunction questions were also examined. For 1 cohort, the questions were directed at the mere occurrence of the parafunctions; in the other, the questions addressed the perceived stressfulness of parafunctional behavior to the jaw.
A principal component analysis of the responses to the questionnaires led to 3 factors (scales) in both cohorts: (1) a BRUX scale for bruxism activities; (2) a BITE scale for biting activities (eg, chewing gum, nails); and (3) a SOFT scale for soft tissue activities (eg, tongue, lips). Statistical significance was reached for 2 of the 6 relationships studied (P < .05), but with a very low explained variance (approximately 3.5%).
No clinically relevant relationships were found between different types of self-reported oral parafunctions and TMD pain complaints.
探讨颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)患者中不同类型的自我报告的口腔副功能与疼痛强度之间的关系。
两组TMD疼痛患者,一组303例,另一组226例,完成了一份包含12项内容的口腔副功能问卷以及研究诊断标准轴II问卷,其中包括特征性疼痛强度评分(CPI)。研究了口腔副功能与CPI之间的关系;对年龄和性别进行了控制。还研究了口腔副功能问题表述方式的影响。对于一组患者,问题针对的是副功能的单纯发生情况;对于另一组患者,问题涉及副功能行为对颌骨的感知压力。
对问卷回答进行主成分分析后,两组均得出3个因素(量表):(1)磨牙活动的BRUX量表;(2)咬合活动(如嚼口香糖、咬指甲)的BITE量表;(3)软组织活动(如舌头、嘴唇)的SOFT量表。在所研究的6种关系中有2种达到了统计学显著性(P <.05),但解释方差非常低(约3.5%)。
在不同类型的自我报告的口腔副功能与TMD疼痛主诉之间未发现具有临床相关性的关系。