Morrish Glynn A, Foster David J R, Somogyi Andrew A
Department of Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology, The University of Adelaide, and Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Australia.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Mar;61(3):326-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02573.x.
To determine the in vitro kinetics of morphine-3-glucuronide (M3G) and morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) formation and the inhibition potential by methadone enantiomers and structurally related opioids.
M3G and M6G formation kinetics from morphine were determined using microsomes from five human livers. Inhibition of glucuronide formation was investigated with eight inhibitors (100 microm) and the mechanism of inhibition determined for (R)- and (S)-methadone (70-500 microm) using three microsomal samples.
Glucuronide formation displayed single enzyme kinetics. The M3G Vmax (mean+/-SD) was 4.8-fold greater than M6G Vmax (555+/-110 vs. 115+/-19 nmol mg-1 protein h-1; P=0.006, mean of difference 439; 95% confidence interval 313, 565 nmol mg-1 protein h-1). Km values for M3G and M6G formation were not significantly different (1.12+/-0.37 vs. 1.11+/-0.31 mm; P=0.89, 0.02; -0.29, 0.32 mm). M3G and M6G formation was inhibited (P<0.01) with a significant increase in the M3G/M6G ratio (P<0.01) for all compounds tested. Detailed analysis with (R)- and (S)-methadone revealed noncompetitive inhibition with (R)-methadone Ki of 320+/-42 microm and 192+/-12 microm for M3G and M6G, respectively, and (S)-methadone Ki of 226+/-30 microm and 152+/-20 microm for M3G and M6G, respectively. Ki values for M3G inhibition were significantly greater than for M6G for (R)-methadone (P=0.017, 128; 55, 202 microm) and (S)-methadone (P=0.026, 75; 22, 128 microm).
Both methadone enantiomers noncompetitively inhibited the formation of morphine's primary metabolites, with greater inhibition of M6G formation compared with M3G. These findings indicate a mechanism for reduced morphine clearance in methadone-maintained patients and reduced relative formation of the opioid active M6G compared with M3G.
确定吗啡 - 3 - 葡萄糖醛酸苷(M3G)和吗啡 - 6 - 葡萄糖醛酸苷(M6G)形成的体外动力学以及美沙酮对映体和结构相关阿片类药物的抑制潜力。
使用来自五个人肝脏的微粒体测定吗啡形成M3G和M6G的动力学。用八种抑制剂(100微摩尔)研究葡萄糖醛酸苷形成的抑制作用,并使用三个微粒体样品确定(R) - 和(S) - 美沙酮(70 - 500微摩尔)的抑制机制。
葡萄糖醛酸苷形成表现出单酶动力学。M3G的Vmax(平均值±标准差)比M6G的Vmax大4.8倍(555±110对115±19纳摩尔·毫克⁻¹蛋白质·小时⁻¹;P = 0.006,差异平均值439;95%置信区间313,565纳摩尔·毫克⁻¹蛋白质·小时⁻¹)。M3G和M6G形成的Km值无显著差异(1.12±0.37对1.11±0.31毫摩尔;P = 0.89,0.02; - 0.29,0.32毫摩尔)。对于所有测试化合物,M3G和M6G的形成均受到抑制(P < 0.01),且M3G/M6G比值显著增加(P < 0.01)。对(R) - 和(S) - 美沙酮的详细分析显示,(R) - 和(S) - 美沙酮对M3G和M6G的抑制均为非竞争性抑制,(R) - 美沙酮对M3G和M6G的Ki分别为320±42微摩尔和192±12微摩尔,(S) - 美沙酮对M3G和M6G的Ki分别为226±30微摩尔和152±20微摩尔。对于(R) - 美沙酮(P = 0.017,128;55,202微摩尔)和(S) - 美沙酮(P = 0.026,75;22,128微摩尔),M3G抑制的Ki值显著大于M6G抑制的Ki值。
两种美沙酮对映体均非竞争性抑制吗啡主要代谢产物的形成,与M3G相比,对M6G形成的抑制作用更强。这些发现表明了在美沙酮维持治疗患者中吗啡清除率降低以及与M3G相比阿片类活性M6G相对形成减少的机制。