Suppr超能文献

肾动脉双功超声检查作为检测肾动脉狭窄的筛查和监测工具:与当前参考标准成像的比较

Renal artery duplex ultrasonography as a screening and surveillance tool to detect renal artery stenosis: a comparison with current reference standard imaging.

作者信息

Soares Gregory M, Murphy Timothy P, Singha Malwinder S, Parada Andrea, Jaff Michael

机构信息

Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Brown University, 593 Eddy St, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2006 Mar;25(3):293-8. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.3.293.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Digital subtraction angiography quantitative vessel analysis (QVA) to assess percent renal arterial stenosis (RAS) is the reference standard. Quantitative vessel analysis is not ideal for screening purposes. Renal artery duplex ultrasonography (RADUS) is a noninvasive method to screen for RAS using well-known parameters. We investigated the direct correlation between several RADUS parameters and QVA to evaluate the acceptability of RADUS as a RAS screening and surveillance tool.

METHODS

We performed a multicenter retrospective study. Stenoses were evaluated in all patients with arteriograms and RADUS examinations within 30 days of each other in the span of 1 year. Percent stenosis of each stenotic renal artery segment was calculated digitally with QVA and correlated with the corresponding peak systolic velocity (PSV) and renal-aortic ratio (RAR) obtained with RADUS. Descriptive statistics and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated. Correlation of percent stenosis, PSV, and RAR was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of diagnostic cut points for each RADUS parameter were calculated.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven renal arteries were included. Thirty-three arteries had less than 60% stenosis; 34 had stenosis of 60% or greater. The mean values were PSV, 272.791 cm/s; RAR, 3.716; and angiographic percent stenosis, 51.731%. Receiver operating characteristic curves showed higher accuracy for RAR with stenoses of 60% or greater versus PSV.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal artery duplex ultrasonographic parameters for 60% or greater RAS correlate well with QVA. For detecting stenosis of 60% or greater, RAR is the most accurate parameter at a threshold of 2.5. Renal-aortic ratio is more accurate than PSV. Peak systolic velocity may be a useful RADUS alternative parameter for hemodynamically important stenoses in the setting of aortic disease when aortic velocities are less than 40 or greater than 100 cm/s.

摘要

目的

数字减影血管造影定量血管分析(QVA)用于评估肾动脉狭窄百分比(RAS)是参考标准。定量血管分析用于筛查目的并不理想。肾动脉双功超声检查(RADUS)是一种使用知名参数筛查RAS的非侵入性方法。我们研究了几个RADUS参数与QVA之间的直接相关性,以评估RADUS作为RAS筛查和监测工具的可接受性。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心回顾性研究。在1年的时间跨度内,对所有在彼此30天内进行了血管造影和RADUS检查的患者的狭窄情况进行评估。每个狭窄肾动脉节段的狭窄百分比通过QVA进行数字计算,并与通过RADUS获得的相应收缩期峰值速度(PSV)和肾主动脉比值(RAR)相关联。计算描述性统计量和受试者操作特征曲线。进行狭窄百分比、PSV和RAR的相关性分析。计算每个RADUS参数诊断切点的敏感性、特异性和准确性。

结果

纳入67条肾动脉。33条动脉狭窄小于60%;34条动脉狭窄60%或更高。平均值为PSV 272.791 cm/s;RAR 3.716;血管造影狭窄百分比51.731%。受试者操作特征曲线显示,对于狭窄60%或更高的情况,RAR比PSV具有更高的准确性。

结论

对于60%或更高的RAS,肾动脉双功超声参数与QVA相关性良好。对于检测60%或更高的狭窄,RAR在阈值为2.5时是最准确的参数。肾主动脉比值比PSV更准确。当主动脉速度小于40 cm/s或大于100 cm/s时,收缩期峰值速度可能是RADUS在主动脉疾病背景下对血流动力学重要狭窄的一个有用替代参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验