Falagas Matthew E, Matthaiou Dimitrios K, Bliziotis Ioannis A
Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences (AIBS), Athens, Greece.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006 Apr;57(4):639-47. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl044. Epub 2006 Feb 24.
The addition of an aminoglycoside to a beta-lactam for the treatment of patients with infective endocarditis has been supported by data from laboratory and animal studies.
We sought to review the evidence from the available comparative clinical trials regarding the role of aminoglycosides in combination with a beta-lactam for the treatment of bacterial endocarditis caused by Gram-positive cocci.
The studies for our meta-analysis were retrieved from searches of the PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, as well as from the references cited in relevant articles. No limits were set regarding the language and date of publication of the studies.
Included studies were prospective studies that provided comparative data regarding the effectiveness of the treatment and/or mortality in patients receiving monotherapy with a beta-lactam or beta-lactam/aminoglycoside combination therapy.
Two independent reviewers performed the literature search, study selection and extraction of data from relevant studies.
No clinical trial comparing beta-lactam monotherapy with beta-lactam/aminoglycoside combination therapy for the treatment of enterococcal endocarditis was found. We performed a meta-analysis of five available comparative trials [four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one comparative prospective trial], which included 261 patients with bacterial endocarditis in native valves due to Staphylococcus aureus (four studies) or streptococci of the viridans group (one study). There was no statistically significant difference between beta-lactam monotherapy and beta-lactam/aminoglycoside combination therapy regarding mortality [odds ratio (OR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.21-1.66], treatment success (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 0.49-3.05), treatment success without surgery (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 0.64-4.30) or relapse of endocarditis (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.15-4.29). Nephrotoxicity was less common in the beta-lactam monotherapy arm than in the beta-lactam/aminoglycoside combination therapy arm (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.88, P = 0.024). No difference between the two treatment arms was found in subanalyses of the four studies that included only patients with staphylococcal infections in terms of mortality (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.26-1.86, fixed effects model), treatment success (OR = 1.27, 95% CI = 0.47-3.43, fixed effects model) or relapse (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.12-4.92, fixed effects model).
The relatively small number of available comparative trials was the major limitation of this meta-analysis.
The limited evidence from the available prospective comparative studies does not offer support for the addition of an aminoglycoside to beta-lactam treatment of patients with endocarditis caused by Gram-positive cocci. A large multicentre RCT is necessary to reach a definitive conclusion on this issue.
实验室和动物研究数据支持在β-内酰胺类药物基础上加用氨基糖苷类药物治疗感染性心内膜炎患者。
我们试图回顾现有比较性临床试验中关于氨基糖苷类药物联合β-内酰胺类药物治疗革兰氏阳性球菌所致细菌性心内膜炎作用的证据。
我们的荟萃分析研究通过检索PubMed和Cochrane对照试验中心注册库数据库以及相关文章中引用的参考文献获得。对研究的语言和发表日期未设限制。
纳入的研究为前瞻性研究,提供了接受β-内酰胺类单药治疗或β-内酰胺类/氨基糖苷类联合治疗患者的治疗效果和/或死亡率的比较数据。
两名独立的审阅者进行文献检索、研究选择以及从相关研究中提取数据。
未发现比较β-内酰胺类单药治疗与β-内酰胺类/氨基糖苷类联合治疗肠球菌性心内膜炎的临床试验。我们对五项现有比较性试验[四项随机对照试验(RCT)和一项比较性前瞻性试验]进行了荟萃分析,这些试验纳入了261例因金黄色葡萄球菌(四项研究)或草绿色链球菌(一项研究)导致的自体瓣膜细菌性心内膜炎患者。在死亡率[比值比(OR)=0.59,95%置信区间(95%CI)=0.21 - 1.66]、治疗成功率(OR = 1.25,95%CI = 0.49 - 3.05)、无需手术的治疗成功率(OR = 1.66,95%CI = 0.64 - 4.30)或心内膜炎复发率(OR = 0.79,95%CI = 0.15 - 4.29)方面,β-内酰胺类单药治疗与β-内酰胺类/氨基糖苷类联合治疗之间无统计学显著差异。β-内酰胺类单药治疗组的肾毒性比β-内酰胺类/氨基糖苷类联合治疗组少见(OR = 0.38,95%CI = 0.16 - 0.88,P = 0.024)。在仅纳入葡萄球菌感染患者的四项研究的亚组分析中,两个治疗组在死亡率(OR = 0.69,95%CI = 0.26 - 1.86,固定效应模型)、治疗成功率(OR = 1.27,95%CI = 0.47 - 3.43,固定效应模型)或复发率(OR = 0.76,95%CI = 0.12 - 4.92,固定效应模型)方面未发现差异。
现有比较性试验数量相对较少是本荟萃分析的主要局限性。
现有前瞻性比较研究的有限证据不支持在β-内酰胺类药物治疗革兰氏阳性球菌所致心内膜炎患者时加用氨基糖苷类药物。需要进行一项大型多中心随机对照试验才能就此问题得出明确结论。