Suppr超能文献

在老年患者中,依折麦布联合他汀类药物持续治疗对改善血脂谱及实现低密度脂蛋白胆固醇目标的有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验数据的亚组分析

Effectiveness of the addition of ezetimibe to ongoing statin therapy in modifying lipid profiles and attaining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goals in older and elderly patients: subanalyses of data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Pearson Thomas, Denke Margo, McBride Patrick, Battisti Wendy P, Brady William E, Palmisano Joanne

机构信息

University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York 14642, USA.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2005 Dec;3(4):218-28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Ezetimibe Add-on to Statin for Effectiveness (EASE) trial examined the effectiveness and safety profile of ezetimibe (EZE) added to ongoing statin therapy in 3030 patients with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels exceeding National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP 111) goals.

OBJECTIVE

Because people aged > 65 years are at increased risk for development of coronary heart disease (CHD), these subgroup analyses of data from the EASE trial were conducted to determine the extent of change in LDL-C levels and attainment of NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals with the addition of EZE to ongoing statin therapy in patients aged 65 to 74 years (the older group) and > or = 75 years (the elderly group).

METHODS

In the multicenter (299 sites), community-based, double-blind, placebo-controlled EASE trial, patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive EZE 10 mg/d or placebo in addition to their ongoing statin therapy for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the percent reduction in LDL-C levels, and the principal secondary end point was the proportion of patients achieving NCEP ATP III target LDL-C levels. The effects of the addition of EZE on additional lipid and lipoprotein measures and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were also examined, as was tolerability. Study analyses were performed in the modified intent-to-treat population.

RESULTS

This subgroup analysis included data from 841 patients in the older age group (579 EZE + statin, 262 placebo + statin), which constituted 27.8% of the overall EASE population, and 466 in the elderly group (307 EZE + statin, 159 placebo + statin), which constituted 15.4% of the overall EASE population. The former group included 436 (51.8%) men and 405 (48.2%) women, with a mean (SD) age of 69.2 (3.0) years; the latter group included 227 (48.7%) men and 239 (51.3%) women, with a mean age of 78.5 (3.2) years. The characteristics of the 2 groups were comparable at baseline. In the older group, 717 (85.3%) had CHD or a CHD risk equivalent, as did 421 (90.3%) of those in the elderly group. Thirty-two patients in the older group and 17 in the elderly group discontinued the study. The reasons for discontinuation included clinical adverse events (n = 23), withdrawal of consent (n = 15), loss to follow-up (n = 4), protocol deviation (n = 2), and other reasons (n = 5). EZE + statin significantly reduced LDL-C compared with placebo + statin (older group: mean [SE] treatment difference, -25.1% [1.4]; P < 0.001; elderly group: treatment difference, -22.0% [1.8]; P < 0.001). The LDL-Glowering effects of treatment were consistent in the 2 groups. EZE + statin therapy significantly improved other lipid parameters (triglycerides, non high density lipoprotein cholesterol, and total cholesterol, P < 0.001 in both age groups; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, P < 0.03 in the older group only) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels compared with EZE + placebo (P < 0.03). The attainment of LDL-C goals also was significantly increased with EZE + statin compared with placebo + statin (older group: 72.3% vs 18.9%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 14.59; 95% CI, 9.55 to 22.28; P < 0.001; elderly group: 73.3% vs 18.9%; OR = 13.44; 95% CI, 7.72 to 23.41; P < 0.001). EZE + statin therapy was well tolerated by patients in both age groups, with a safety profile comparable to that of placebo + statin.

CONCLUSIONS

In these older and elderly patients, many of them at high risk for CHD, EZE added to ongoing statin therapy was well tolerated and was an effective treatment option for improving lipid profiles and attainment of LDL-C goals. Adding EZE improved rates of attainment of NCEP ATP III LDL-C goals without increases in the dose or potency of statin therapy. Further studies are necessary to determine whether these results can be generalized to other older and elderly populations.

摘要

背景

依折麦布联合他汀治疗有效性(EASE)试验,在3030例低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平超过美国国家胆固醇教育计划成人治疗组第三次报告(NCEP ATP Ⅲ)目标的患者中,研究了在正在进行的他汀治疗基础上加用依折麦布(EZE)的有效性和安全性。

目的

由于年龄>65岁的人群患冠心病(CHD)的风险增加,因此进行了EASE试验数据的这些亚组分析,以确定在65至74岁(老年组)和≥75岁(高龄组)的患者中,在正在进行的他汀治疗基础上加用EZE后,LDL-C水平的变化程度以及达到NCEP ATP Ⅲ LDL-C目标的情况。

方法

在多中心(299个地点)、基于社区的、双盲、安慰剂对照的EASE试验中,患者按2∶1比例随机分配,在继续接受他汀治疗的基础上,接受10mg/d依折麦布或安慰剂治疗6周。主要疗效终点是LDL-C水平降低的百分比,主要次要终点是达到NCEP ATP Ⅲ目标LDL-C水平的患者比例。还研究了加用EZE对其他血脂和脂蛋白指标以及高敏C反应蛋白的影响,以及耐受性。研究分析在改良意向性治疗人群中进行。

结果

该亚组分析纳入了老年组841例患者(579例依折麦布+他汀,262例安慰剂+他汀)的数据,占EASE总体人群的27.8%,以及高龄组466例患者(307例依折麦布+他汀,159例安慰剂+他汀)的数据,占EASE总体人群的15.4%。老年组包括436例(51.8%)男性和405例(48.2%)女性,平均(标准差)年龄为69.2(3.0)岁;高龄组包括227例(48.7%)男性和239例(51.3%)女性,平均年龄为78.5(3.2)岁。两组在基线时的特征具有可比性。在老年组中,717例(85.3%)患有CHD或CHD等危症,高龄组中421例(90.3%)也是如此。老年组有32例患者、高龄组有17例患者停止了研究。停药原因包括临床不良事件(n = 23)、撤回同意(n = 15)、失访(n = 4)、方案偏离(n = 2)和其他原因(n = 5)。与安慰剂+他汀相比,依折麦布+他汀显著降低了LDL-C(老年组:平均[标准误]治疗差异,-25.1%[1.4];P<0.001;高龄组:治疗差异,-22.0%[1.8];P<0.001)。两组治疗的LDL-C降低效果一致。与依折麦布+安慰剂相比,依折麦布+他汀治疗显著改善了其他血脂参数(甘油三酯、非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和总胆固醇,两个年龄组P<0.001;高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,仅老年组P<0.03)和高敏C反应蛋白水平(P<0.03)。与安慰剂+他汀相比,依折麦布+他汀使LDL-C目标的达成率也显著提高(老年组:分别为72.3%和18.9%;优势比[OR]=14.59;95%CI,9.55至22.28;P<0.001;高龄组:73.3%和18.9%;OR = 13.44;95%CI,7.72至23.41;P<0.001)。两个年龄组的患者对依折麦布+他汀治疗的耐受性良好,安全性与安慰剂+他汀相当。

结论

在这些老年和高龄患者中,其中许多人有患CHD的高风险,在正在进行的他汀治疗基础上加用依折麦布耐受性良好,是改善血脂谱和实现LDL-C目标的有效治疗选择。加用依折麦布提高了NCEP ATP Ⅲ LDL-C目标的达成率,而无需增加他汀治疗的剂量或强度。有必要进一步研究这些结果是否可推广到其他老年和高龄人群。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验