Jewett Don L, Hart Toryalai, Larson-Prior Linda J, Baird Bill, Olson Marram, Trumpis Michael, Makayed Katherine, Bavafa Payam
Abratech Corporation, Sausalito, CA, USA.
BMC Neurosci. 2006 Feb 23;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-7-18.
A new method has been used to obtain human sensory evoked-responses whose time-domain waveforms have been undetectable by previous methods. These newly discovered evoked-responses have durations that exceed the time between the stimuli in a continuous stream, thus causing an overlap which, up to now, has prevented their detection. We have named them "A-waves", and added a prefix to show the sensory system from which the responses were obtained (visA-waves, audA-waves, somA-waves).
When A-waves were studied as a function of stimulus repetition-rate, it was found that there were systematic differences in waveshape at repetition-rates above and below the psychophysical region in which the sensation of individual stimuli fuse into a continuity. The fusion phenomena is sometimes measured by a "Critical Fusion Frequency", but for this research we can only identify a frequency-region [which we call the STZ (Sensation-Transition Zone)]. Thus, the A-waves above the STZ differed from those below the STZ, as did the sensations. Study of the psychophysical differences in auditory and visual stimuli, as shown in this paper, suggest that different stimulus features are detected, and remembered, at stimulation rates above and below STZ.
The results motivate us to speculate that: 1) Stimulus repetition-rates above the STZ generate waveforms which underlie "fusion-memory" whereas rates below the STZ show neuronal processing in which "flash-memory" occurs. 2) These two memories differ in both duration and mechanism, though they may occur in the same cell groups. 3) The differences in neuronal processing may be related to "figure" and "ground" differentiation. We conclude that A-waves provide a novel measure of neural processes that can be detected on the human scalp, and speculate that they may extend clinical applications of evoked response recordings. If A-waves also occur in animals, it is likely that A-waves will provide new methods for comparison of activity of neuronal populations and single cells.
一种新方法已被用于获取人类感觉诱发电位,其在时域中的波形是以前的方法无法检测到的。这些新发现的诱发电位持续时间超过了连续刺激流中刺激之间的时间间隔,从而导致重叠,到目前为止,这一直妨碍了它们的检测。我们将它们命名为“A波”,并添加了一个前缀以表明获得这些反应的感觉系统(视觉A波、听觉A波、躯体感觉A波)。
当研究A波作为刺激重复率的函数时,发现在高于和低于心理物理学区域(其中单个刺激的感觉融合为连续性)的重复率下,波形存在系统差异。融合现象有时通过“临界融合频率”来测量,但对于本研究,我们只能确定一个频率区域[我们称之为感觉转换区(STZ)]。因此,STZ以上的A波与STZ以下的A波不同,感觉也是如此。本文所示的听觉和视觉刺激心理物理学差异研究表明,在高于和低于STZ的刺激率下,检测到并记住了不同的刺激特征。
这些结果促使我们推测:1)高于STZ的刺激重复率产生构成“融合记忆”基础的波形,而低于STZ的速率显示发生“闪光记忆”的神经元处理。2)这两种记忆在持续时间和机制上都有所不同,尽管它们可能发生在相同的细胞群中。3)神经元处理的差异可能与“图形”和“背景”的区分有关。我们得出结论,A波提供了一种可在人类头皮上检测到的神经过程的新测量方法,并推测它们可能扩展诱发电位记录的临床应用。如果A波也出现在动物身上,那么A波很可能会为比较神经元群体和单细胞的活动提供新方法。