Suppr超能文献

老年患者心力衰竭评分与死亡率及心力衰竭住院率的关联:来自模式选择试验(MOST)的见解

The association of the heart failure score with mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in elderly patients: insights from the Mode Selection Trial (MOST).

作者信息

Lewis Eldrin F, Hellkamp Anne S, Pfeffer Marc A, Greenspon Arnold J, Machado Christian, Singh Steven, Schron Eleanor, Lee Kerry L, Lamas Gervasio A

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2006 Mar;151(3):699-705. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.05.018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and physician preferences as well as cost favor an increasingly higher threshold for hospital admission for heart failure (HF) treatment. This trend risks masking the severity and prevalence of HF as hospitalization for HF may decrease.

METHODS

Heart Failure Score (HFS) has 4 ordinal subscales assessing (1) HF symptoms, physical signs of left (2) and (3) right HF, and (4) therapy changes for HF. Heart Failure Score was calculated for 1257 of 2010 (63%) patients enrolled in the MOST trial in sinus node dysfunction, who survived and had complete first-year HFS data at 4 postpacemaker implant visits (1, 3, 6, and 12 months). Heart Failure Score was summed and ranged from 0 to 14, with lower scores representing less HF.

RESULTS

There were 1257 patients (median age 74 years [interquartile range 68-79], 47% were women, 61% had hypertension, 20%, diabetes mellitus, and 23%, prior myocardial infarction). The median HFS accumulated during 1 year was 4 (interquartile range 1-8). Of patients with a benign first year, those with a higher HFS were more likely to die during subsequent follow-up compared with patients with lower HFS (hazard ratio 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.10 for each 1-point increase, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing HFS is associated with an increased risk of mortality in mostly elderly patients without pre-existing HF. Heart Failure Score may be a useful surrogate HF end point for clinical trials.

摘要

背景

患者和医生的偏好以及成本因素使得心力衰竭(HF)治疗的住院门槛越来越高。由于因HF住院的情况可能会减少,这种趋势有掩盖HF严重程度和患病率的风险。

方法

心力衰竭评分(HFS)有4个序贯子量表,用于评估(1)HF症状、(2)左心和(3)右心HF的体征,以及(4)HF治疗的变化。在2010名参加窦房结功能障碍MOST试验的患者中,对1257名(63%)存活且在起搏器植入后4次随访(1、3、6和12个月)时有完整的第一年HFS数据的患者计算心力衰竭评分。心力衰竭评分相加后范围为0至14分,分数越低表示HF越轻。

结果

共有1257名患者(中位年龄74岁[四分位间距68 - 79岁],47%为女性,61%患有高血压,20%患有糖尿病,23%有心肌梗死病史)。1年期间累积的HFS中位数为4(四分位间距1 - 8)。在第一年情况良好的患者中,与HFS较低的患者相比,HFS较高的患者在随后的随访中死亡的可能性更大(风险比1.07,每增加1分的95%置信区间为1.04 - 1.10,P <.001)。

结论

在大多无既往HF的老年患者中,HFS升高与死亡风险增加相关。心力衰竭评分可能是临床试验中一个有用的HF替代终点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验