Grunfeld Elizabeth A, Maher E Jane, Browne Susannah, Ward Pippa, Young Teresa, Vivat Bella, Walker Gay, Wilson Cathy, Potts Henry W, Westcombe Alex M, Richards Michael A, Ramirez Amanda J
Department of Psychology and Cancer Research, United Kingdom London Psychosocial Group, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College, London, United Kingdom.
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Mar 1;24(7):1090-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.9208.
To examine advanced breast cancer patients' perceptions of the key decision-making consultation for palliative chemotherapy.
One hundred two women with advanced breast cancer, who were offered palliative chemotherapy, participated in a study-specific semistructured interview examining perceptions of the information they had received and their involvement in the decision-making process. One hundred seventeen interviews included 70 in relation to first-line chemotherapy and 47 in relation to second-line chemotherapy (15 patients were interviewed in relation to both first- and second-line chemotherapy).
Eighty-six percent of patient interviews (n = 101) reported patient satisfaction with the information they received, and 91% (n = 106) reported satisfaction with the decision-making process. Factors most influential in decisions to accept chemotherapy were the possibility of controlling the tumor (45%, n = 53 of patient interviews) and providing hope (33%, n = 28 of patient interviews; 19%, n = 13 being offered first-line chemotherapy v 43%, n = 20 being offered second-line chemotherapy; P = .006). Thirty-eight percent of patient interviews (n = 44) reported the patient as taking an active role in the decision-making process (33%, n = 23 at first-line chemotherapy v 43%, n = 20 at second-line chemotherapy; P = .06).
Women offered second-line chemotherapy were more likely to undergo chemotherapy because of the hope it offers and were more likely to take an active role in that decision compared with women who were offered first-line chemotherapy. Compassionate and honest communication about prognosis and likelihood of benefit from treatment may help to close the gap between hope and expectation and enable patients to make fully informed decisions about palliative chemotherapy.
探讨晚期乳腺癌患者对姑息化疗关键决策咨询的看法。
102例接受姑息化疗的晚期乳腺癌女性参与了一项特定研究的半结构化访谈,调查她们对所获信息的看法以及在决策过程中的参与情况。117次访谈中,70次涉及一线化疗,47次涉及二线化疗(15例患者就一线和二线化疗均接受了访谈)。
86%的患者访谈(n = 101)报告患者对所获信息满意,91%(n = 106)报告对决策过程满意。接受化疗决策中最具影响力的因素是控制肿瘤的可能性(45%,n = 53次患者访谈)和带来希望(33%,n = 28次患者访谈;一线化疗患者中为19%,n = 13;二线化疗患者中为43%,n = 20;P = .006)。38%的患者访谈(n = 44)报告患者在决策过程中发挥了积极作用(一线化疗时为33%,n = 23;二线化疗时为43%,n = 20;P = .06)。
与接受一线化疗的女性相比,接受二线化疗的女性因化疗带来的希望更有可能接受化疗,并且更有可能在该决策中发挥积极作用。关于预后和治疗获益可能性的富有同情心且诚实的沟通,可能有助于缩小希望与期望之间的差距,并使患者能够就姑息化疗做出充分知情的决策。