Lindberg C, Borg K, Edström L, Hedström A, Oldfors A
Department of Neurology, Sahlgrenska Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Neurol Sci. 1991 May;103(1):76-81. doi: 10.1016/0022-510x(91)90287-h.
Five patients with inclusion body myositis (IBM), an acquired inflammatory myopathy, and five patients with Welander hereditary distal myopathy (WDM) were compared clinically and with neurophysiological and morphological techniques. Both diseases have a late insidious onset, but the course of IBM is more severe. IBM mainly affects proximal muscles in the lower extremities, while distal muscle groups are involved in both upper and lower extremities. In WDM there is always a strict distal muscle involvement. The neurophysiological characteristics of the two conditions include both myopathic and neurogenic components. In both diseases there were rimmed vacuoles in muscle fibres and at the ultrastructural level cytoplasmic 15-18 nm filamentous inclusions. Although the histopathology of muscle in IBM and WDM has some common features, inflammatory infiltrates were never found in WDM. Such infiltrates seem to be an important clue to the correct diagnosis of IBM.
对5例包涵体肌炎(一种获得性炎性肌病)患者和5例韦兰德遗传性远端肌病(WDM)患者进行了临床、神经生理学和形态学技术方面的比较。两种疾病均起病隐匿且较晚,但包涵体肌炎的病程更为严重。包涵体肌炎主要累及下肢近端肌肉,而上、下肢的远端肌群均可受累。在韦兰德遗传性远端肌病中,始终严格累及远端肌肉。这两种病症的神经生理学特征包括肌病性和神经源性成分。两种疾病的肌纤维中均有镶边空泡,在超微结构水平有15 - 18纳米的胞质丝状包涵体。虽然包涵体肌炎和韦兰德遗传性远端肌病的肌肉组织病理学有一些共同特征,但在韦兰德遗传性远端肌病中从未发现炎性浸润。这种浸润似乎是正确诊断包涵体肌炎的一个重要线索。