Suppr超能文献

疟疾的临床免疫

Clinical immunity to malaria.

作者信息

Schofield Louis, Mueller Ivo

机构信息

The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, 1G, Royal Parade, Parkville, Victoria 3050, Australia.

出版信息

Curr Mol Med. 2006 Mar;6(2):205-21. doi: 10.2174/156652406776055221.

Abstract

Under appropriate conditions of transmission intensity, functional immunity to malaria appears to be acquired in distinct stages. The first phase reduces the likelihood of severe or fatal disease; the second phase limits the clinical impact of 'mild' malaria; and the third provides partial but incomplete protection against pathogen burden. These findings suggest clinical immunity to mortality and morbidity is acquired earlier, with greater ease, and via distinct mechanisms as compared to anti-parasite immunity, which is more difficult to achieve, takes longer and is only ever partially efficacious. The implications of this view are significant in that current vaccination strategies aim predominantly to achieve anti-parasite immunity, although imparting clinical immunity is the public health objective. Despite enormous relevance for global public health, the mechanisms governing these processes remain obscure. Four candidate mechanisms might mediate clinical immunity, namely immunity to cytoadherence determinants, tolerance to toxins, acquired immunity to toxins, and immunoregulation. This review addresses the targets and determinants of clinical immunity, and considers the implications for vaccine development.

摘要

在适当的传播强度条件下,对疟疾的功能性免疫似乎是在不同阶段获得的。第一阶段降低了严重或致命疾病的可能性;第二阶段限制了“轻度”疟疾的临床影响;第三阶段提供了对病原体负荷的部分但不完全的保护。这些发现表明,与抗寄生虫免疫相比,对死亡率和发病率的临床免疫获得得更早、更容易,且通过不同的机制,而抗寄生虫免疫更难实现,需要更长时间,且效果始终只是部分有效。这一观点的影响重大,因为当前的疫苗接种策略主要旨在实现抗寄生虫免疫,尽管赋予临床免疫才是公共卫生目标。尽管对全球公共卫生具有极大的相关性,但控制这些过程的机制仍不清楚。四种候选机制可能介导临床免疫,即对细胞黏附决定因素的免疫、对毒素的耐受性、对毒素的获得性免疫和免疫调节。本综述探讨了临床免疫的靶点和决定因素,并考虑了其对疫苗开发的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验