Pescatori M, Ayabaca S M, Cafaro D, Iannello A, Magrini S
Coloproctology Unit, Villa Flaminia Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Colorectal Dis. 2006 Jan;8(1):11-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00835.x.
Marsupialization of anal fistulotomy/fistulectomy wound leaves less raw unepithelialized tissue. The suture results in a more rapid healing and is likely to reduce the risk of bleeding but at the cost of an increased pain and infection. The aim of this prospective study was to compare the outcomes of marsupialization and open wound.
Forty-six consecutive patients with anal fistulae were recruited in a randomized controlled trial. Fistula tracks were treated by fistulotomy and/or fistulectomy. The resulting wounds were marsupialized to the skin edges with locking continuous absorbable sutures (M group) or left open (O group). The clinical outcome was then evaluated. The intra-operative effect of the suture on wound size was recorded as well as the postoperative pain using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) and the occurrence of both wound bleeding and infection.
Twenty-two patients were randomized to the M group and 24 to the O group. There were no differences in the age, sex and fistula type between the groups. Mean follow-up times were 10.5 and 13.8 months, respectively. No significant difference was observed in postoperative pain, the VAS being 3.5 +/- 1.5 in the M group and 3.4 +/- 1.6 in the O group at 12 h (mean +/- s.e.m.; n.s). The marsupialization nearly halved the size of the wound intra-operatively from an area of 1749 +/- 66 mm2 to 819 +/- 38 mm2 (P < 0.001), which subsequently decreased to 217 +/- 15 mm2 after 4 weeks (P < 0.01). No significant reduction of wound size was observed in the O group (from 1171 +/- 31 mm2 to 543 +/- 19; n.s). Bleeding occurred less frequently in M group than in O group (36%vs 46%, P < 0.05), whereas the difference in the postoperative sepsis rate was not significant, being 14% in M vs 21% in the O group. Three reinterventions were needed in both groups due to wound sepsis.
Marsupialization after fistulotomy/fistulectomy significantly reduces the size of the wound and the risk of bleeding, without increasing postoperative pain and sepsis.
肛瘘切开术/瘘管切除术伤口的袋形缝合术留下的未上皮化的创面组织较少。缝合可使愈合更快,并可能降低出血风险,但代价是疼痛和感染风险增加。这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较袋形缝合术和开放伤口的效果。
在一项随机对照试验中招募了46例连续的肛瘘患者。瘘管通过肛瘘切开术和/或瘘管切除术进行治疗。用锁定连续可吸收缝线将 resulting 伤口袋形缝合至皮肤边缘(M组)或保持开放(O组)。然后评估临床结果。记录缝合对伤口大小的术中效果,以及使用0-10视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的术后疼痛,以及伤口出血和感染的发生情况。
22例患者被随机分配至M组,24例被分配至O组。两组患者在年龄、性别和瘘管类型方面无差异。平均随访时间分别为10.5个月和13.8个月。术后疼痛无显著差异,术后12小时M组的VAS评分为3.5±1.5,O组为3.4±(此处原文有误,应为1.6)(均值±标准误;无统计学意义)。袋形缝合术在术中使伤口大小几乎减半,从1749±66平方毫米降至819±38平方毫米(P<0.001),4周后降至217±15平方毫米(P<0.01)。O组未观察到伤口大小有显著减小(从1171±31平方毫米降至543±19平方毫米;无统计学意义)。M组出血发生率低于O组(36%对46%,P<0.05),而术后脓毒症发生率的差异无统计学意义,M组为14%,O组为21%。两组均因伤口脓毒症需要进行3次再次干预。
肛瘘切开术/瘘管切除术后的袋形缝合术可显著减小伤口大小和出血风险,且不增加术后疼痛和脓毒症发生率。