• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从浸水冷却是零小时和二十四小时后冲洗的肉鸡胴体中回收细菌。

Recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses rinsed zero and twenty-four hours after immersion chilling.

作者信息

Cason J A, Berrang M E, Smith D P

机构信息

US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Russell Research Center, Athens, GA 30604-5677, USA.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2006 Feb;85(2):333-6. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.2.333.

DOI:10.1093/ps/85.2.333
PMID:16523635
Abstract

Microbiological sampling of processed broiler carcasses often relies on the technique of whole-carcass rinsing; however, the rinse sampling is sometimes done immediately after immersion chilling and sometimes as long as 24 h after immersion chilling. To test whether carcass rinses done immediately after chilling can be compared with rinses 24 h after chilling, 20 whole broiler carcasses exiting the chiller of a broiler processing plant were sampled on each of 3 d. All carcasses were bagged aseptically and rinsed for 1 min in 400 mL of sterile water. Recovered rinse liquid was poured into a sterile container, and rinsed carcasses were placed in clean plastic bags; all materials were held overnight at 4 degrees C. On the following day, all carcasses were rinsed again in 400 mL of sterile water as before, and all rinse samples were cultured by standard methods to enumerate coliforms, Escherichia coli, and Campylobacter and to determine incidence of Salmonella. Statistical analysis used paired comparisons between the same carcasses rinsed at 0 and 24 h after chilling; numbers of bacteria were expressed as log cfu/mL of rinse. In 2 of 3 replications, significantly higher numbers of coliforms and E. coli were found in the rinse samples taken immediately after chilling vs. rinse samples done at 24 h. There were no differences in numbers of Campylobacter or incidence of Salmonella between rinses taken at 0 and 24 h. More study is required to determine whether whole-carcass rinse samples performed at 0 and 24 h after chilling are microbiologically equivalent.

摘要

加工后的肉鸡胴体微生物采样通常依赖于全胴体冲洗技术;然而,冲洗采样有时在浸渍冷却后立即进行,有时在浸渍冷却后长达24小时进行。为了测试冷却后立即进行的胴体冲洗是否可以与冷却后24小时的冲洗进行比较,在3天中的每一天对离开肉鸡加工厂冷却器的20只完整肉鸡胴体进行采样。所有胴体均无菌装袋,并在400 mL无菌水中冲洗1分钟。将回收的冲洗液倒入无菌容器中,冲洗后的胴体放入干净的塑料袋中;所有材料在4℃下保存过夜。第二天,所有胴体像之前一样再次在400 mL无菌水中冲洗,所有冲洗样品采用标准方法培养以计数大肠菌群、大肠杆菌和弯曲杆菌,并确定沙门氏菌的发生率。统计分析采用冷却后0小时和24小时冲洗的同一胴体之间的配对比较;细菌数量以每毫升冲洗液的对数cfu表示。在3次重复中的2次中,冷却后立即采集的冲洗样品中发现的大肠菌群和大肠杆菌数量显著高于24小时时采集的冲洗样品。冷却后0小时和24小时冲洗的弯曲杆菌数量或沙门氏菌发生率没有差异。需要更多的研究来确定冷却后0小时和24小时进行的全胴体冲洗样品在微生物学上是否等效。

相似文献

1
Recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses rinsed zero and twenty-four hours after immersion chilling.从浸水冷却是零小时和二十四小时后冲洗的肉鸡胴体中回收细菌。
Poult Sci. 2006 Feb;85(2):333-6. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.2.333.
2
Recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses after immersion chilling in different volumes of water, part 2.在不同水量中浸泡冷却后从肉鸡胴体中回收细菌,第2部分。
Poult Sci. 2008 Mar;87(3):573-6. doi: 10.3382/ps.2006-00444.
3
Effect of prechill fecal contamination on numbers of bacteria recovered from broiler chicken carcasses before and after immersion chilling.预冷粪便污染对肉仔鸡屠体在浸水冷却前后回收的细菌数量的影响。
J Food Prot. 2004 Sep;67(9):1829-33. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.9.1829.
4
Effect of dry air or immersion chilling on recovery of bacteria from broiler carcasses.干燥空气或浸泡冷却对肉鸡胴体细菌回收率的影响。
J Food Prot. 2007 Aug;70(8):1829-34. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-70.8.1829.
5
Efficacy of neutralizing buffered peptone water for recovery of Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Enterobacteriaceae from broiler carcasses at various points along a commercial immersion chilling process with peroxyacetic acid.中和缓冲蛋白胨水对商业过氧乙酸浸泡式冷却过程中不同点鸡只胴体中沙门氏菌、弯曲杆菌和肠杆菌科的回收效果。
Poult Sci. 2019 Jan 1;98(1):393-397. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey361.
6
Broiler carcass bacterial counts after immersion chilling using either a low or high volume of water.使用少量或大量水进行喷淋冷却后肉鸡胴体的细菌计数。
Poult Sci. 2006 Oct;85(10):1802-6. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.10.1802.
7
Bacteria recovery from genetically feathered and featherless broiler carcasses after immersion chilling.浸泡冷却后从基因有羽和无羽肉鸡屠体中回收细菌。
Poult Sci. 2005 Sep;84(9):1499-504. doi: 10.1093/ps/84.9.1499.
8
Effect of fecal contamination and cross-contamination on numbers of coliform, Escherichia coli, Campylobacter, and Salmonella on immersion-chilled broiler carcasses.粪便污染和交叉污染对沉浸式冷却肉鸡胴体上大肠菌群、大肠杆菌、弯曲杆菌和沙门氏菌数量的影响。
J Food Prot. 2005 Jul;68(7):1340-5. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-68.7.1340.
9
Comparison of neck skin excision and whole carcass rinse sampling methods for microbiological evaluation of broiler carcasses before and after immersion chilling.宰前和宰后浸烫冷却鸡只胴体微生物评估中颈皮切除与全胴体冲洗采样方法的比较。
J Food Prot. 2010 May;73(5):976-80. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-73.5.976.
10
Impact of feathers and feather follicles on broiler carcass bacteria.羽毛和毛囊对肉鸡胴体细菌的影响。
Poult Sci. 2004 Aug;83(8):1452-5. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.8.1452.