Pieczarkowski Stanisław, Fyderek Krzysztof
Polsko-Amerykański Instytut Pediatrii, Collegium Medicum, Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego w Krakowie Klinika Pediatrii Gastroenterologii i Zywienia.
Przegl Lek. 2005;62(9):851-4.
About 2/3 of constipated children present anal-rectal dyssynergy (ARD) with paradoxical contraction of the external anal sphincter (EAS) during defecation.
The aim of our study was to answer the question whether additional treatment with biofeedback training (BF) is more effective than traditional treatment.
MATERIALS, METHODS: We assessed chronically constipated children who fulfilled the criteria of ARD: recto-sigmoid transit time in Hinton's test with radio-paque markers at least 28.8 h, paradoxical EAS contraction during defecation trials (anorectal manometry). The study included 22 constipated children (16 boys and 6 girls), aged 5 to 14 years (mean 8.1 +/- SD 2.8). Children were randomly divided in two groups. In group I at the start of the study children had four day-by-day sessions of BF training based on the anorectal manometry and the surface EMG. Children from group II received only traditional treatment. The follow-up was 6 months. Improvement was estimated based on manometric data, number and quality of stools.
In the group I after one month, more manometric parameters, significantly improved as compared to the II group. During the observation period the number of stools increased and their quality improved in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of the above mentioned symptoms.
Treatment with BF can improve rectal sensation and particularly defecation dynamics, faster than the traditional method. There is no significant effect of additional BF treatment on such objective symptoms as the number and quality of stools.
约2/3的便秘儿童存在肛门直肠协同失调(ARD),排便时肛门外括约肌(EAS)出现矛盾性收缩。
我们研究的目的是回答生物反馈训练(BF)辅助治疗是否比传统治疗更有效的问题。
我们评估了符合ARD标准的慢性便秘儿童:在Hinton试验中使用不透X线标记物测量直肠乙状结肠转运时间至少为28.8小时,排便试验(肛门直肠测压)时EAS出现矛盾性收缩。该研究纳入了22名5至14岁(平均8.1±标准差2.8)的便秘儿童(16名男孩和6名女孩)。儿童被随机分为两组。在研究开始时,第一组儿童基于肛门直肠测压和表面肌电图进行了为期四天的BF训练。第二组儿童仅接受传统治疗。随访期为6个月。根据测压数据、大便次数和质量评估改善情况。
一个月后,第一组的更多测压参数与第二组相比有显著改善。在观察期内,两组的大便次数均增加,大便质量均改善。两组在上述症状方面无统计学显著差异。
BF治疗比传统方法能更快改善直肠感觉,尤其是排便动力。BF辅助治疗对大便次数和质量等客观症状无显著影响。