Huber Daniel R, Weggelaar Christina L, Motta Philip J
Department of Biology, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Ave., SCA 110, Tampa, FL 33620, USA.
Zoology (Jena). 2006;109(2):109-19. doi: 10.1016/j.zool.2005.12.002. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
Although bite force is a frequently studied performance measure of feeding ecology, changes in bite force over ontogeny have rarely been investigated. Biting by the blacktip shark Carcharhinus limbatus was theoretically modeled over ontogeny to investigate the scaling of bite force, the morphological basis of the observed scaling relationship, the ecological consequences of ontogenetic changes in performance, and whether cranial morphometrics can be used as an accurate proxy for bite force. Theoretical bite force, which was positively allometric with respect to total length (TL), ranged from 32 N (61 cm TL) to 423 N (152 cm TL) at the anterior tips of the jaws and from 107 (61 cm TL) to 1083 N (152 cm TL) at the posterior teeth. This observation is attributed to positive allometry in the mechanical advantage of the jaw-adducting mechanism and the cross-sectional area of all four jaw-adducting muscles. Theoretical bite force was accurately predicted by cranial morphometrics including prebranchial length and head width as well. Although positive allometry of bite force in C. limbatus would seem to indicate an ecological necessity for this phenomenon, dietary analyses do not necessarily indicate any ontogenetic shift in prey types requiring larger bite forces. The positively allometric increase in theoretical bite force may be associated with numerous other selective pressures including maintenance of an apical position within the ecosystem.
尽管咬合力是进食生态学中一项经常被研究的性能指标,但个体发育过程中咬合力的变化却很少被研究。对黑鳍鲨(Carcharhinus limbatus)的咬合力进行了个体发育过程的理论建模,以研究咬合力的缩放比例、观察到的缩放关系的形态学基础、性能个体发育变化的生态后果,以及颅骨形态测量学是否可以用作咬合力的准确替代指标。理论咬合力与全长(TL)呈正异速生长关系,在颌骨前端范围为32 N(TL 61 cm)至423 N(TL 152 cm),在后牙处为107 N(TL 61 cm)至1083 N(TL 152 cm)。这一观察结果归因于颌骨内收机制的机械优势和所有四块颌骨内收肌的横截面积的正异速生长。理论咬合力也可以通过包括鳃前长度和头宽在内的颅骨形态测量学准确预测。虽然黑鳍鲨咬合力的正异速生长似乎表明了这种现象的生态必要性,但饮食分析并不一定表明猎物类型有任何需要更大咬合力的个体发育转变。理论咬合力的正异速生长增加可能与许多其他选择压力有关,包括在生态系统中维持顶端地位。