Suppr超能文献

交接班是否过于“自动化”?质量改进专家担心错误可能会增加。

Are handoffs too 'automatic'? QI experts fear errors could rise.

出版信息

Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2006 Jan;13(1):1-4.

Abstract

Since errors have not been eliminated, additional controls must be considered. Have a clinician from another department serve as your "second set of eyes". Reformat your checklists to draw staff attention to key sub-processes.

摘要

由于错误尚未消除,必须考虑增加控制措施。让另一个部门的临床医生充当你的“第二双眼睛”。重新设计你的检查表,以吸引员工关注关键子流程。

相似文献

1
Are handoffs too 'automatic'? QI experts fear errors could rise.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv. 2006 Jan;13(1):1-4.
2
QI experts say 'automatic' handoffs could cause errors.
Hosp Case Manag. 2006 Feb;14(2):24-6.
3
JCAHO comments on handoff requirement.
OR Manager. 2005 Aug;21(8):8.
4
Handoffs: lessons from other industries.
OR Manager. 2005 Aug;21(8):11-2.
7
Improving the complex nature of care transitions.
J Nurs Care Qual. 2007 Oct-Dec;22(4):289-92. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000290407.66403.1c.
8
JCAHO to look closely at patient handoffs.
Hosp Case Manag. 2006 Jan;14(1):9-10.
9
The new survey process will surprise you.
ED Manag. 2002 Dec;14(12):136-7.
10
Handoffs and communication: the underappreciated roles of situational awareness and inattentional blindness.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;53(3):545-58. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181ec1ac7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验