Gray Andrew C, Coupar Ian M, White Paul J
Department of Pharmaceutical Biology and Pharmacology, Victorian College of Pharmacy, Monash University, 381 Royal Pde, Parkville, VIC 3052, Melbourne, Australia.
Life Sci. 2006 Jul 10;79(7):674-85. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2006.02.021. Epub 2006 Mar 6.
The opioid receptors, mu, delta and kappa, conduct the major pharmacological effects of opioid drugs, and exhibit intriguing functional relationships and interactions in the CNS. Previously established hypotheses regarding the mechanisms underlying these phenomena specify theoretical patterns of relative cellular localisation for the different receptor types. In this study, we have used double-label immunohistochemistry to compare the cellular distributions of delta and kappa receptors with those of mu receptors in the rat CNS. Regions of established significance in opioid addiction were examined. Extensive mu/delta co-localisation was observed in neuron-like cells in several regions. mu and kappa receptors were also often co-localised in neuron-like cell bodies in several regions. However, intense kappa immunoreactivity (ir) also appeared in a separate, morphologically distinct population of cells that did not express mu receptors. These small, ovoid cells were often closely apposed against the larger, mu-ir cell bodies. Such cellular appositions were seen in several regions, but were particularly common in the medial thalamus, the periaqueductal grey and brainstem regions. These findings support proposals that functional similarities, synergy and cooperativity between mu and delta receptors arise from widespread co-expression by cells and intracellular molecular interactions. Although co-expression of mu and kappa receptors was also detected, the appearance of a separate population of kappa-expressing cells supports proposals that the contrasting and functionally antagonistic properties of mu and kappa receptors are due to expression in physiologically distinct cell types. Greater understanding of opioid receptor interaction mechanisms may provide possibilities for therapeutic intervention in opioid addiction and other conditions.
阿片受体,即μ、δ和κ受体,介导阿片类药物的主要药理作用,并在中枢神经系统中表现出有趣的功能关系和相互作用。先前关于这些现象潜在机制的假设明确了不同受体类型相对细胞定位的理论模式。在本研究中,我们使用双标免疫组织化学方法比较了大鼠中枢神经系统中δ和κ受体与μ受体的细胞分布。对在阿片类药物成瘾中已确定具有重要意义的区域进行了检查。在几个区域的神经元样细胞中观察到广泛的μ/δ共定位。在几个区域的神经元样细胞体中也经常观察到μ和κ受体的共定位。然而,强烈的κ免疫反应性(ir)也出现在一群形态上不同的独立细胞中,这些细胞不表达μ受体。这些小的卵形细胞常常紧密贴附在较大的、有μ免疫反应性的细胞体上。这种细胞贴附在几个区域都可见到,但在丘脑内侧、导水管周围灰质和脑干区域尤为常见。这些发现支持了以下观点:μ和δ受体之间的功能相似性、协同作用和合作源于细胞的广泛共表达和细胞内分子相互作用。虽然也检测到了μ和κ受体的共表达,但一群单独的表达κ的细胞的出现支持了以下观点:μ和κ受体的对比性和功能拮抗特性是由于在生理上不同的细胞类型中表达。对阿片受体相互作用机制的更深入了解可能为阿片类药物成瘾及其他病症的治疗干预提供可能性。