McDonnell C O, Fearn S J, Baker S R, Goodman M A, Price D, Lawrence-Brown M M D
Department of Vascular Surgery, Mount Hospital, Perth, WA, Australia.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Jul;32(1):46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.12.026. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
The incidence of neurological injury following carotid angioplasty and stenting is of great interest to those advocating it as an alternative to endarterectomy in the management of critical carotid stenosis. A significant inter-observer variation exists in determining the presence or absence of a neurological deficit following the procedure objective imaging would be advantageous. In this study, we sought to assess diffusion weighted MRI as a diagnostic tool in evaluating the incidence of neurological injury following carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS).
The first 110 cases of CAS in our unit were included in this series. The procedure was abandoned in three patients. Patients underwent intracranial and extracranial MR angiography, together with diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) prior to and following CAS and had a formal neurological assessment in the intensive care unit after the procedure.
One hundred and ten Procedures were attempted in 98 patients. Twenty-eight percent were asymptomatic. Following CAS, 7.2% of patients had a positive neurological exam (two major strokes with one fatality) and 21% had positive DWI scans, equating to a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 85% for DWI in detecting cerebral infarction following CAS. The positive predictive value of the test was 0.3 and negative predictive value 0.99. The major stroke and death rate was 1.8%. While the use of a cerebral protection device appeared to significantly reduce the incidence of cerebral infarction (5% vs. 25%, p = 0.031) this may be a reflection of the learning curve encountered during the study.
The incidence of subclinical DWI detected neurological injury was significantly higher than clinical neurological deficit following CAS. Conventional methods of neurological assessment of patients undergoing CAS may be too crude to detect subtle changes and more sensitive tests of cerebral function are required to establish whether these subclinical lesions are relevant.
在主张将颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术作为严重颈动脉狭窄管理中动脉内膜切除术替代方案的人群中,该术后神经损伤的发生率备受关注。在确定术后是否存在神经功能缺损方面,观察者间存在显著差异,客观成像将具有优势。在本研究中,我们试图评估弥散加权磁共振成像(MRI)作为诊断工具在评估颈动脉血管成形术和支架置入术(CAS)后神经损伤发生率中的作用。
本系列纳入了我们科室的前110例CAS病例。3例患者手术中止。患者在CAS前后接受了颅内和颅外磁共振血管造影以及弥散加权MRI(DWI)检查,并在术后在重症监护病房接受了正式的神经功能评估。
对98例患者进行了110次手术尝试。28%为无症状患者。CAS术后,7.2%的患者神经功能检查呈阳性(2例严重中风,1例死亡),21%的患者DWI扫描呈阳性,这意味着DWI检测CAS后脑梗死的敏感性为86%,特异性为85%。该检测的阳性预测值为0.3,阴性预测值为0.99。严重中风和死亡率为1.8%。虽然使用脑保护装置似乎显著降低了脑梗死的发生率(5%对25%,p = 0.031),但这可能反映了研究过程中遇到的学习曲线。
CAS术后弥散加权成像检测到的亚临床神经损伤发生率显著高于临床神经功能缺损。对接受CAS的患者进行神经功能评估的传统方法可能过于粗略,无法检测到细微变化,需要更敏感的脑功能测试来确定这些亚临床病变是否相关。