Oldenburg Rogier A, Kroeze-Jansema Karin, Meijers-Heijboer Hanne, van Asperen Cristi J, Hoogerbrugge Nicoline, van Leeuwen Inge, Vasen Hans F A, Cleton-Jansen Anne-Marie, Kraan Jaennelle, Houwing-Duistermaat Jeanine J, Morreau Hans, Cornelisse Cees J, Devilee Peter
Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Mar 15;12(6):1693-700. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2230.
Since the identification of BRCA1 and BRCA2, there has been no major breast cancer susceptibility gene discovered by linkage analysis in breast cancer families. This has been attributed to the heterogeneous genetic basis for the families under study. Recent studies have indicated that breast tumors arising in women carrying a BRCA1 mutation have distinct histopathologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features. To a lesser extent, this is also true for breast tumors from BRCA2 carriers. This indicates that it might be possible to decrease the genetic heterogeneity among families in which BRCA1 and BRCA2 have been excluded with high certainty (BRCAx families) if distinct subgroups of BRCAx-related breast tumors could be identified.
Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis with at least one marker per chromosomal arm (65 markers) was used to characterize 100 breast tumors derived from 92 patients from 42 selected BRCAx families. In addition, the immunophenotype of 10 markers was compared with that of 31 BRCA1- and 21 BRCA2-related breast tumors.
The BRCAx-related tumors were characterized by more frequent LOH at 22q relative to sporadic breast cancer (P < 0.02), and differed significantly from BRCA1- and BRCA2-related tumors in their positivity for Bcl2. However, cluster analyses of the combined data (LOH and immunohistochemistry) did not result in subgroups that would allow meaningful subclassification of the families. On chromosomes 2, 3, 6, 12, 13, 21, and 22, we found markers at which LOH occurred significantly more frequent among the tumors from patients belonging to a single family than expected on the basis of overall LOH frequencies. Nonetheless, linkage analysis with markers for the corresponding regions on chromosomes 12, 21, and 22 did not reveal significant logarithm of the odds.
自BRCA1和BRCA2被鉴定以来,通过连锁分析在乳腺癌家族中尚未发现主要的乳腺癌易感基因。这归因于所研究家族的遗传基础异质性。最近的研究表明,携带BRCA1突变的女性所患的乳腺肿瘤具有独特的组织病理学、免疫表型和遗传特征。在较小程度上,携带BRCA2的女性所患乳腺肿瘤也是如此。这表明,如果能够识别出与BRCAx相关的乳腺肿瘤的不同亚组,那么有可能降低在BRCA1和BRCA2已被高度确定排除的家族(BRCAx家族)中的遗传异质性。
使用每条染色体臂至少一个标记(65个标记)的杂合性缺失(LOH)分析来表征来自42个选定BRCAx家族的92名患者的100个乳腺肿瘤。此外,将10个标记的免疫表型与31个与BRCA1相关和21个与BRCA2相关的乳腺肿瘤的免疫表型进行了比较。
与散发性乳腺癌相比,BRCAx相关肿瘤的特征是22q处的LOH更频繁(P < 0.02),并且在Bcl2阳性方面与BRCA1和BRCA2相关肿瘤有显著差异。然而,对综合数据(LOH和免疫组织化学)的聚类分析并未产生能够对家族进行有意义的亚分类的亚组。在染色体2、3、6、12、13、21和22上,我们发现了一些标记,在属于单个家族的患者的肿瘤中,这些标记处的LOH发生频率明显高于基于总体LOH频率的预期。尽管如此,对染色体12、21和22上相应区域的标记进行连锁分析并未发现显著的优势对数。