Suppr超能文献

在法国国家艾滋病研究机构阿基坦队列中,基于HIV-1核苷/核苷酸逆转录酶抑制剂且包含替诺福韦酯的治疗方案的病毒学应答情况。

Virological response to HIV-1 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors-based, tenofovir DF-including regimens in the ANRS Aquitaine Cohort.

作者信息

Balestre Eric, Dupon Michel, Capdepont Sophie, Thiébaut Rodolphe, Boucher Sébastien, Fleury Hervé, Dabis François, Masquelier Bernard

机构信息

INSERM U593, Université Victor Segalen, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2006 Jun;36(2):95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Mar 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

HIV-1 nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI)-only based, comprising tenofovir DF(TDF) have been shown to lead to high rates of virological failures (VF), mainly in patients on first-line combination therapy. We wished to investigate the virological response to these regimens in a large cohort of antiretroviral (ARV)-treated patients.

METHODS

Patients followed-up in the Aquitaine Cohort in 2001-2003 and who had received NRTI-based, TDF-including regimens for at least 3 months were included. The VF was defined as: (i) a decrease in plasma HIV-1 RNA <0.5 log(10)copies/ml between M0 and M3; or (ii) a plasma HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/ml at M3 in patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at M0. The baseline RT genotype was determined in a subgroup of patients.

RESULTS

Within 121 patients (95% ARV-experienced) who received either lamivudine (3TC)/didanosine (DDI)/TDF (n=48), or abacavir (ABC)/3TC/TDF (n=14), or 3TC/zidovudine (ZDV)/TDF (n=27), or 3TC/ZDV/ABC/TDF (n=20), or DDI/ABC/TDF (n=12), the ABC/3TC/TDF and DDI/ABC/TDF combinations were associated with the highest frequencies of VF. In contrast the use of ZDV was related to a better virological response. The baseline RT genotype was also predictive of the virological outcome.

CONCLUSION

NRTI-based, TDF-including therapies can lead to high rates of VF both in ARV-naïve and in ARV-experienced patients. Our data strongly suggest the interest of associating ZDV and TDF in these regimens.

摘要

背景

仅基于HIV-1核苷/核苷酸逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTI),包含替诺福韦酯(TDF)的治疗方案已显示出较高的病毒学失败率(VF),主要发生在接受一线联合治疗的患者中。我们希望在一大群接受抗逆转录病毒(ARV)治疗的患者中研究这些治疗方案的病毒学反应。

方法

纳入2001年至2003年在阿基坦队列中接受随访且接受基于NRTI、包含TDF的治疗方案至少3个月的患者。病毒学失败定义为:(i)在M0和M3之间血浆HIV-1 RNA下降<0.5 log(10)拷贝/毫升;或(ii)M0时血浆HIV-1 RNA<50拷贝/毫升的患者在M3时血浆HIV-1 RNA>50拷贝/毫升。在一组亚组患者中确定基线RT基因型。

结果

在121例患者(95%有ARV治疗经验)中,这些患者接受了拉米夫定(3TC)/去羟肌苷(DDI)/TDF(n = 48)、或阿巴卡韦(ABC)/3TC/TDF(n = 14)、或3TC/齐多夫定(ZDV)/TDF(n = 27)、或3TC/ZDV/ABC/TDF(n = 20)、或DDI/ABC/TDF(n = 12)治疗,其中ABC/3TC/TDF和DDI/ABC/TDF组合的病毒学失败频率最高。相比之下,使用ZDV与更好的病毒学反应相关。基线RT基因型也可预测病毒学结果。

结论

基于NRTI、包含TDF的治疗方案在初治和有ARV治疗经验的患者中均可导致较高的病毒学失败率。我们的数据强烈表明在这些治疗方案中联合使用ZDV和TDF是有益的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验