Roy-Charland Annie, Saint-Aubin Jean
Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Jan;59(1):38-45. doi: 10.1080/17470210500269428.
When asked to detect target letters while reading a text, participants miss more letters in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. In this phenomenon, known as the missing-letter effect, two factors covary: word frequency and word class. According to the GO model, there should be an interaction between word class and word frequency with more omissions for function than for content words only among high-frequency words. This pattern would be due to the fact that function words could only assume a structure-supporting role if they are identified rapidly, which is only possible for high-frequency words. These predictions were tested by assessing omission rate for frequent and rare function and content words. Results lend support to the GO model with more omissions for frequent than for rare words, and more omissions for the function than for the content word among high-frequency words, but not among low-frequency words. These results were observed both in English (Experiment 1) and in French (Experiment 2).
当要求参与者在阅读文本时检测目标字母时,他们在高频功能词中遗漏的字母比在低频实词中更多。在这种被称为遗漏字母效应的现象中,有两个因素相互关联:词频和词类。根据GO模型,词类和词频之间应该存在交互作用,即只有在高频词中,功能词的遗漏才会比实词更多。这种模式是因为功能词只有在被快速识别时才能起到结构支持作用,而这只有高频词才能做到。通过评估高频和低频功能词及实词的遗漏率对这些预测进行了测试。结果支持了GO模型,高频词中比低频词有更多遗漏,高频词中功能词比实词有更多遗漏,但低频词中并非如此。在英语(实验1)和法语(实验2)中均观察到了这些结果。