Brodsky Anne E, Faryal Tahmeena
UMBC, Baltimore, Maryland 21250, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2006 Jun;37(3-4):311-20. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9015-x.
Research in which the researcher and the participants come from different contexts and communities always presents challenges. This paper is based on qualitative, community-based research carried out by a U.S. researcher in Pakistan and Afghanistan with an underground Afghan women's humanitarian and political organization. Written from the perspectives of two authors, one an organization insider and the other the outside researcher, it presents some unique examples of diversity challenges, while also illuminating issues that exist in subtle ways even in more common research experiences. Within the context of multiple diversities, two challenges to bridging diversity are discussed: (1) Can or should all diversities be bridged? and (2) Can narrow attention to diversity lead to ignoring similarities? We argue that the definitions of success and failure in bridging diversity are themselves relative terms, grounded in this very diversity. Further, even when research fails to bridge diversity it may, in fact, not only honor and respect that diversity, but ultimately lead to a better understanding of it.
研究者与参与者来自不同背景和社群的研究总会带来挑战。本文基于一位美国研究者在巴基斯坦和阿富汗与一个阿富汗地下女性人道主义和政治组织开展的定性、基于社区的研究。文章由两位作者撰写,一位是组织内部人员,另一位是外部研究者,文中呈现了一些独特的多样性挑战实例,同时也揭示了即便在更常见的研究经历中也以微妙方式存在的问题。在多重多样性的背景下,探讨了弥合多样性的两个挑战:(1)是否能够或应该弥合所有的多样性?(2)对多样性的狭隘关注是否会导致忽视相似性?我们认为,弥合多样性中成功与失败的定义本身就是相对的概念,基于这种多样性本身。此外,即使研究未能弥合多样性,实际上它不仅可能尊重这种多样性,而且最终可能会带来对它的更好理解。