Bozeman William P, Kleiner Douglas M, Ferguson Kevin L
Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest University, Medical Center Blvd., Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Resuscitation. 2006 Jun;69(3):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.09.027. Epub 2006 Mar 23.
Prospective and retrospective studies have shown that empiric use of fibrinolytic agents in sudden cardiac arrest is safe and may improve outcomes in sudden cardiac arrest. Use of fibrinolytic agents for this indication is increasing in response to these data.
A prospective multicenter observational trial was performed in three emergency departments (EDs) to determine the proportion of patients that respond to empiric fibrinolysis with tenecteplase (TNK) after failing to respond to Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) measures. Cardiac arrest patients unresponsive to ACLS, who were given TNK by their treating physician, were enrolled in an outcome registry. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival, complications, and neurological outcomes were recorded.
Fifty patients received TNK after a mean of 30min of cardiac arrest and eight doses of ACLS medications. One hundred and thirteen concurrent control patients received standard ACLS measures. ROSC occurred in 26% of TNK patients (95% confidence interval (CI) 16-40%) compared to 12.4% (95% CI 6.9-20%) among ACLS controls (p=.04); 12% (4.5-24%) of TNK patients survived to admission compared to none in the control group (p=.0007); 4% (0.5-14%) survived to 24h (p=NS); and 4% (0.5-14%) survived to hospital discharge (p=NS). All survivors had a good neurological outcome (Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2). One intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) occurred. No other significant bleeding complications were observed.
Empiric fibrinolysis with TNK in cardiac arrest is associated with increased ROSC and short term survival, and with survival to hospital discharge with good neurological function in patients who fail to respond to ACLS. Results may improve with earlier administration. Prospective controlled interventional trials are indicated to evaluate this promising new therapy.
前瞻性和回顾性研究表明,在心脏骤停时经验性使用纤溶药物是安全的,并且可能改善心脏骤停的预后。鉴于这些数据,针对这一适应症使用纤溶药物的情况正在增加。
在三个急诊科进行了一项前瞻性多中心观察性试验,以确定在对高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)措施无反应后,对使用替奈普酶(TNK)进行经验性纤溶治疗有反应的患者比例。对ACLS无反应且其主治医生给予TNK的心脏骤停患者被纳入结局登记。记录自主循环恢复(ROSC)、生存率、并发症和神经学结局。
50例患者在心脏骤停平均30分钟并接受8剂ACLS药物后接受了TNK治疗。113例同期对照患者接受了标准ACLS措施。TNK组患者中26%出现ROSC(95%置信区间(CI)16 - 40%),而ACLS对照组为12.4%(95% CI 6.9 - 20%)(p = 0.04);TNK组患者中12%(4.5 - 24%)存活至入院,而对照组无一例存活(p = 0.0007);4%(0.5 - 14%)存活至24小时(p = 无统计学意义);4%(0.5 - 14%)存活至出院(p = 无统计学意义)。所有存活者神经学结局良好(脑功能分类(CPC)1 - 2级)。发生1例颅内出血(ICH)。未观察到其他显著的出血并发症。
心脏骤停时使用TNK进行经验性纤溶治疗与ROSC增加和短期生存率提高相关,并且与对ACLS无反应的患者存活至出院且神经功能良好相关。更早给药可能改善结果。需要进行前瞻性对照干预试验来评估这种有前景的数据疗法。