Suppr超能文献

根据剑桥风险评分和体重指数估算中年2型糖尿病。

Type 2 diabetes mellitus in midlife estimated from the Cambridge Risk Score and body mass index.

作者信息

Thomas Claudia, Hyppönen Elina, Power Chris

机构信息

Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, England.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2006 Mar 27;166(6):682-8. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.6.682.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Cambridge Risk Score (CRS) was developed to screen for type 2 diabetes mellitus risk. We assessed the ability of the CRS to predict glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels and determined whether the CRS was better than body mass index (BMI) at predicting HbA(1c) levels in midlife.

METHODS

We included 7452 participants without known diabetes in a biomedical survey of the 1958 British Birth Cohort at 45 years of age. Receiver operator characteristic curves were used to compare the ability of the CRS and BMI to identify individuals with elevated HbA(1c) levels using thresholds of 7.0% or more, 6.0% or more, and 5.5% or more.

RESULTS

Of the total sample, 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-1.1%) had HbA(1c) levels of 7.0% or more; 3.8% (95% CI, 3.2%-4.5%), 6.0% or more; and 24.4% (95% CI, 23.1%-25.9%), 5.5% or more. The CRS detected individuals with elevated HbA(1c) levels with reasonable accuracy (area under the curve, 0.84 for HbA(1c) level >or=7.0%; 0.76 for HbA(1c) level >or=6.0%). Similar area under the curve values were obtained using BMI alone (0.84 for HbA(1c) level >or=7.0%; 0.79 for HbA(1c) level >or=6.0%). When tested using the lower HbA(1c) threshold of 5.5% or more, the CRS and BMI did not perform well (areas under the curve, 0.65 and 0.63 for CRS and BMI, respectively). Both measures indicated that approximately 20% of the cohort were at increased risk of diabetes. Owing to the low prevalence of diabetes at 45 years of age, only 2% to 3% of those considered at risk had elevated HbA(1c) levels.

CONCLUSIONS

For a population in mid-adult life, the CRS identified individuals with elevated HbA(1c) levels reasonably well. However, the CRS had no advantage compared with BMI alone in identifying diabetes risk.

摘要

背景

剑桥风险评分(CRS)旨在筛查2型糖尿病风险。我们评估了CRS预测糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平的能力,并确定在预测中年人群的HbA1c水平方面,CRS是否优于体重指数(BMI)。

方法

在对1958年英国出生队列45岁人群进行的生物医学调查中,我们纳入了7452名无糖尿病史的参与者。采用受试者工作特征曲线,比较CRS和BMI使用7.0%及以上、6.0%及以上和5.5%及以上阈值来识别HbA1c水平升高个体的能力。

结果

在总样本中,0.9%(95%置信区间[CI],0.7%-1.1%)的人HbA1c水平达到7.0%及以上;3.8%(95%CI,3.2%-4.5%)的人达到6.0%及以上;24.4%(95%CI,23.1%-25.9%)的人达到5.5%及以上。CRS检测HbA1c水平升高个体的准确性尚可(曲线下面积,HbA1c水平≥7.0%时为0.84;HbA1c水平≥6.0%时为0.76)。单独使用BMI也获得了相似的曲线下面积值(HbA1c水平≥7.0%时为0.84;HbA1c水平≥6.0%时为0.79)。当使用5.5%及以上的较低HbA1c阈值进行测试时,CRS和BMI的表现均不佳(CRS和BMI的曲线下面积分别为0.65和0.63)。两种测量方法均表明,约20%的队列人群糖尿病风险增加。由于45岁时糖尿病患病率较低,在被认为有风险的人群中,只有2%至3%的人HbA1c水平升高。

结论

对于中年人群,CRS能较好地识别HbA1c水平升高的个体。然而在识别糖尿病风险方面,CRS与单独使用BMI相比并无优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验