Sappington Thomas W, Arnold Mark D, Brashears Alan D, Parajulee Megha N, Carroll Stanley C, Knutson Allen E, Norman John W
USDA-ARS, Corn Insect and Crop Genetics Research Unit, Genetics Laboratory, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.
J Econ Entomol. 2006 Feb;99(1):67-75. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2006)099[0067:dobwcc]2.0.co;2.
We characterized the level of risk of boll weevil, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, reintroduction to an eradication zone posed by dispersal from cotton modules during and after transport to the gin. Mark-release-recapture experiments in August and September in Texas indicated that most weevils disperse rapidly from the module surface, temperature permitting, unless confined under a module tarp, where most died. Nevertheless, 1-5% of released weevils were recovered alive after 24 h on the side and top surfaces of modules, representing potential dispersants. Mortality of boll weevils caged on the top surface of a module was 95-100% after 1-4 d when maximum air temperatures were > or = 33 degrees C and 72-100% when minimum temperatures were -7 degrees C or lower, but a few survived even after experiencing a minimum daily temperature of -12 degrees C. Under warm (daily maximum temperatures > or = 25 degrees C) and cold (daily minimum temperatures < or = 0 degrees C) weather conditions, survival was higher under the tarp than on the open surface of the module (20 versus 7% and 42 versus 26%, respectively), but mortality was 100% in both locations when temperatures reached 34 degrees C. Our results indicate that although the threat to an eradication zone posed by boll weevil dispersal from an infested module is very low under most environmental conditions, it is probably greatest when 1) a module is constructed and transported from an infested zone during weather too cool for flight, followed by warm weather favorable for flight at the gin yard; or 2) such a module is transported immediately after construction in moderate-to-warm weather.
我们对棉铃象甲(Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman)重新引入根除区的风险水平进行了特征描述,该风险由棉花模块在运输至轧棉厂期间及之后的扩散所造成。8月和9月在得克萨斯州进行的标记释放再捕获实验表明,在温度允许的情况下,除非被限制在模块防水布下(大多数在此情况下会死亡),大多数象甲会迅速从模块表面扩散。尽管如此,在模块侧面和顶面放置24小时后,仍有1% - 5%被释放的象甲被活捉,这些象甲代表了潜在的扩散源。当最高气温≥33℃时,关在模块顶面上的棉铃象甲在1 - 4天后死亡率为95% - 100%;当最低气温≤ - 7℃时,死亡率为72% - 100%,但即使经历了日最低气温为 - 12℃的情况,仍有少数象甲存活。在温暖(日最高气温≥25℃)和寒冷(日最低气温≤0℃)的天气条件下,防水布下的象甲存活率高于模块的开放表面(分别为20%对7%和42%对26%),但当温度达到34℃时,两个位置的象甲死亡率均为100%。我们的结果表明,尽管在大多数环境条件下,棉铃象甲从受侵染模块扩散对根除区构成的威胁非常低,但在以下情况时威胁可能最大:1)一个模块在天气过凉无法飞行时在受侵染区建造并运输,随后在轧棉厂院子里遇到有利于飞行的温暖天气;或2)这样的模块在中等到温暖的天气建造后立即运输。