Suppr超能文献

使用非永久性硬件进行前交叉韧带重建的4种腘绳肌移植物股骨固定系统初始力学性能的比较:一项体外动物研究。

Comparison of initial mechanical properties of 4 hamstring graft femoral fixation systems using nonpermanent hardware for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vitro animal study.

作者信息

Espejo-Baena Alejandro, Ezquerro Francisco, de la Blanca Ana Pérez, Serrano-Fernandez José, Nadal Fernando, Montañez-Heredia Elvira

机构信息

Servicio de Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2006 Apr;22(4):433-40. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.09.021.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the initial mechanical characteristics of 4 systems used to fix tendons to the femur during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 32 porcine femurs were used to study the following fixation systems: Bioabsorbable interference screw (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI), Bio-Transfix Cross-pin (Arthrex, Naples, FL), Biosteon Cross-pin (Stryker), and a fixation technique based on wrapping the graft around the femoral condyle itself, thus allowing it to be fixed in place without the use of any hardware. The mechanical characteristics of each system were obtained by a preconditioned failure tensile test.

RESULTS

The yield load values (990.9 +/- 242.6 N for Bio-Transfix, 905.1 +/- 158.8 N for Biosteon Cross-pin, 684.4 +/- 119.7 N for the without-hardware system (WHS), and 369.4 +/- 120.1 N for the interference screw) revealed significant differences between the techniques that used cross-pins and the other 2 techniques (P < .006) on the one hand, and between the without hardware technique and the interference screw (P < .004) on the other. The stiffness of the 2 cross-pin fixation systems (117.6 +/- 22.5 N for Bio-Transfix and 112.6 +/- 22.5 N for Biosteon) was greater (P < .01) than those of the other systems (79.4 +/- 15.2 N for the WHS and 68.5 +/- 13 N for the interference screw).

CONCLUSIONS

The initial biomechanical properties of the 2 cross-pin fixation systems proved to be superior to those of the other 2 systems studied. The WHS fixation system exhibited better mechanical properties than its interference screw counterpart.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The better initial mechanical characteristics encountered using the Bio-Transfix and Biosteon Cross-pin systems indicate that these systems are better equipped to bear the loads generated by aggressive rehabilitation. The WHS fixation system provides an alternative to interference screw fixation.

摘要

目的

比较在进行前交叉韧带重建时用于将肌腱固定至股骨的4种系统的初始力学特性。

方法

共使用32根猪股骨来研究以下固定系统:可吸收加压螺钉(史赛克公司,密歇根州卡拉马祖)、Bio-Transfix交叉针(爱思泰克公司,佛罗里达州那不勒斯)、Biosteon交叉针(史赛克公司)以及一种基于将移植物环绕股骨髁本身从而无需使用任何硬件即可将其固定到位的固定技术。通过预处理失效拉伸试验获得每个系统的力学特性。

结果

屈服载荷值(Bio-Transfix为990.9±242.6 N,Biosteon交叉针为905.1±158.8 N,无硬件系统(WHS)为684.4±119.7 N,加压螺钉为369.4±120.1 N)显示,一方面,使用交叉针的技术与其他两种技术之间存在显著差异(P <.006),另一方面,无硬件技术与加压螺钉之间存在显著差异(P <.004)。两种交叉针固定系统的刚度(Bio-Transfix为117.6±22.5 N,Biosteon为112.6±22.5 N)大于其他系统(WHS为79.4±15.2 N,加压螺钉为68.5±13 N)(P <.01)。

结论

两种交叉针固定系统的初始生物力学性能被证明优于所研究的其他两种系统。WHS固定系统的力学性能优于其对应的加压螺钉系统。

临床意义

使用Bio-Transfix和Biosteon交叉针系统所遇到的更好的初始力学特性表明,这些系统更有能力承受积极康复所产生的负荷。WHS固定系统为加压螺钉固定提供了一种替代方案。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验