Roh Chul-Young, Lee Keon-Hyung
East Tennessee State University, USA.
J Health Hum Serv Adm. 2006 Winter;28(3):346-65.
About 45 percent of rural patients in Colorado bypassed their local rural hospitals during the 1990s. The effect of this phenomenon is a reduction in occupancy rates and a decrease in the competitiveness of rural hospitals, thereby ultimately causing rural hospitals to close and adversely affecting the communities that they were designed to serve. This study tests whether hospital ownership affects hospital choice by patients after controlling for institutional and individual dimensions. A conditional logistic regression is used to analyze Colorado Inpatient Discharge Data (CIDD) on 85,529 patients in addition to hospital data. Rural Medicare beneficiaries are influenced to choose a particular hospital by a combination of hospital characteristics (the number of beds, the number of services, accreditation, ownership type, and distance from patient residence) and patient characteristics (medical condition, age, gender, race, and total charge for services). Increasing rural hospitals' survivability, collaborating with other rural hospitals, expanding the number of available services, making strategic alliance with other providers are possible strategies that may help ward off encroachment by urban competitors.
在20世纪90年代,科罗拉多州约45%的农村患者绕过了当地的农村医院。这种现象的影响是住院率下降以及农村医院竞争力降低,最终导致农村医院关闭,并对其原本服务的社区产生不利影响。本研究在控制了机构和个体因素后,检验医院所有权是否会影响患者对医院的选择。除医院数据外,还使用条件逻辑回归分析了85529名患者的科罗拉多住院患者出院数据(CIDD)。农村医疗保险受益人在选择特定医院时,会受到医院特征(病床数量、服务数量、认证情况、所有权类型以及与患者居住地的距离)和患者特征(病情、年龄、性别、种族以及服务总费用)的综合影响。提高农村医院的生存能力、与其他农村医院合作、增加可用服务数量、与其他医疗服务提供者建立战略联盟,这些都可能是有助于抵御城市竞争对手侵蚀的策略。