van Kleef Ellen, Frewer Lynn J, Chryssochoidis George M, Houghton Julie R, Korzen-Bohr Sara, Krystallis Thanassis, Lassen Jesper, Pfenning Uwe, Rowe Gene
Marketing and Consumer Behaviour Group, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
Appetite. 2006 Jul;47(1):46-63. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.02.002. Epub 2006 Apr 11.
In designing and implementing appropriate food risk management strategies, it is important to examine how key stakeholders perceive both the practice and effectiveness of food risk management. The objective of this study is to identify similarities and differences in perceptions of, and attitudes to, food risk management practices held by consumers and experts with an interest in food safety. Focus groups were conducted in five European countries chosen for their (hypothesised) cultural differences in attitudes towards risk: Denmark, Germany, Greece, Slovenia and the UK. Content analysis was carried out on the resulting texts and (sub) categories were identified within the analysis framework to facilitate the capture of emerging themes. Five key themes were identified as common to the perceptions of both consumers and experts, although these are not represented in the same way by both groups. These key themes are: (1) efforts made by the responsible authorities to manage food risks; (2) responsibility for prevention and management of food risks; (3) how priorities are established within regulatory systems; (4) scientific progress and its implications for food risk management; and (5) media attention and food safety incidents. Although some similarities emerged between the groups, differences were also identified. For example, experts appeared to be highly negative about media influences, whereas consumers appeared more indifferent about media influences and motives. These different perspectives need to be addressed in order to reduce the perceptual distance between key stakeholders, and in particular, to enhance consumer confidence in the food risk management system. Based on the study findings, recommendations for food risk management policies are outlined.
在设计和实施适当的食品风险管理策略时,审视关键利益相关者如何看待食品风险管理的实践和成效非常重要。本研究的目的是确定对食品安全感兴趣的消费者和专家在对食品风险管理实践的认知及态度方面的异同。在五个因(假设的)对风险态度存在文化差异而选定的欧洲国家开展了焦点小组讨论:丹麦、德国、希腊、斯洛文尼亚和英国。对讨论得出的文本进行了内容分析,并在分析框架内确定了(子)类别,以促进对新出现主题的把握。确定了五个关键主题为消费者和专家的认知所共有,尽管两组对这些主题的表述方式不尽相同。这些关键主题是:(1)责任当局为管理食品风险所做的努力;(2)食品风险预防和管理的责任;(3)监管体系内如何确定优先事项;(4)科学进展及其对食品风险管理的影响;以及(5)媒体关注和食品安全事件。尽管两组之间出现了一些相似之处,但也发现了差异。例如专家似乎对媒体影响持高度负面态度,而消费者对媒体影响和动机似乎更为淡漠。为缩小关键利益相关者之间的认知差距,特别是增强消费者对食品风险管理体系的信心,需要解决这些不同观点。基于研究结果,概述了对食品风险管理政策的建议。