Suppr超能文献

验证医疗保险办公室评估与管理(E/M)服务的现行程序编码(CPT)典型时间。

Validating CPT typical times for Medicare office evaluation and management (E/M) services.

作者信息

Cromwell Jerry, Hoover Sonja, McCall Nancy, Braun Peter

机构信息

RTI International.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2006 Apr;63(2):236-55. doi: 10.1177/1077558705285301.

Abstract

Every 5 years, the federal government reviews the Medicare Fee Schedule for changes in the work effort physicians personally devote to office visits. Using physician face-to-face times reported in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Ambulatory Care Survey (NAMCS), guideline office visit times associated with the 1997-1998 mix of Medicare claims averaged 9 percent longer versus NAMCS; Medicare billed visits with new patients were 32 percent longer. Surgeons and dermatologists had the largest discrepancies in Medicare versus NAMCS times. If CPT guideline times currently in use are now overstated, then intraservice work effort is likely overstated given the high correlation of time with work effort, and Medicare payment levels need to be reduced. Upcoding visit content to higher paid CPT visit codes may also explain seemingly longer Medicare billed times and call for payment reductions as well.

摘要

联邦政府每5年审查一次医疗保险费用表,以了解医生个人在门诊中投入的工作时间的变化。利用疾病控制和预防中心的国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)中报告的医生面对面诊疗时间,与1997 - 1998年医疗保险索赔组合相关的指南门诊时间平均比NAMCS长9%;医疗保险为新患者计费的诊疗时间长32%。外科医生和皮肤科医生在医疗保险与NAMCS时间上的差异最大。如果目前使用的现行程序术语(CPT)指南时间现在被高估,那么鉴于时间与工作投入的高度相关性,服务内工作投入可能也被高估了,医疗保险支付水平需要降低。将诊疗内容向上编码到支付更高的CPT诊疗代码也可能解释了医疗保险计费时间似乎更长的原因,同样也需要降低支付。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验