Kalenscher Tobias, Güntürkün Onur, Calabrese Pasquale, Gehlen Walter, Kalt Thomas, Diekamp Bettina
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Biopsychology,Ruhr-universität Bochum, Germany.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Nov;84(3):521-35. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2005.86-04.
Working memory, the ability to temporarily retain task-relevant information across a delay, is frequently investigated using delayed matching-to-sample (DMTS) or delayed Go/No-Go tasks (DGNG). In DMTS tasks, sample cues instruct the animal which type of response has to be executed at the end of a delay. Typically, performance decreases with increasing delay duration, indicating that working memory fades across a delay. However, no such performance decrease has been found when the sample cues exist of present vs. absent stimuli, suggesting that pigeons do not rely on working memory, but seem to respond by default in those trials. We trained 3 pigeons in a DGNG task and found a similar default response pattern: The diverging slopes of the retention functions on correct Go and No-Go trials suggested that pigeons by default omitted their response following No-Go stimuli, but actively retained task-relevant information across the delay for successful responses on Go trials. We conducted single-cell recordings in the avian nidopallium caudolaterale, a structure comparable to the mammalian prefrontal cortex. On Go trials, many neurons displayed sustained elevated activity during the delay preceding the response, replicating previous findings and suggesting that task-relevant information was neurally represented and maintained across the delay. However, the same units did not show enhanced delay activity preceding correct response suppressions in No-Go trials. This activation-inactivation pattern presumably constitutes a neural correlate of the default response strategy observed in the DGNG task.
工作记忆是一种在延迟期间暂时保留与任务相关信息的能力,通常使用延迟匹配样本(DMTS)或延迟Go/No-Go任务(DGNG)来进行研究。在DMTS任务中,样本线索指示动物在延迟结束时必须执行哪种类型的反应。通常,随着延迟持续时间的增加,表现会下降,这表明工作记忆会在延迟期间逐渐消退。然而,当样本线索是存在与不存在的刺激时,并未发现这种表现下降的情况,这表明鸽子不依赖工作记忆,而是在这些试验中似乎默认做出反应。我们在一个DGNG任务中训练了3只鸽子,并发现了类似的默认反应模式:正确的Go和No-Go试验中保持函数的不同斜率表明,鸽子默认在No-Go刺激后不做出反应,但在延迟期间积极保留与任务相关的信息,以便在Go试验中成功做出反应。我们在鸟类的尾外侧巢皮质进行了单细胞记录,该结构与哺乳动物的前额叶皮质相当。在Go试验中,许多神经元在反应前的延迟期间表现出持续升高的活动,重复了先前的发现,并表明与任务相关的信息在神经上得到了表征并在延迟期间得以维持。然而,在No-Go试验中,相同的神经元在正确反应抑制之前并未表现出增强的延迟活动。这种激活-失活模式大概构成了在DGNG任务中观察到的默认反应策略的神经关联。