Pfennig David W, Rice Amber M, Martin Ryan A
Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Ecology. 2006 Mar;87(3):769-79. doi: 10.1890/05-0787.
We investigated the roles of resource availability and phenotypic plasticity in promoting ecological character displacement (i.e., trait evolution stemming from resource competition between species). Because ecological character displacement generates new populations that differ in resource use, this process should only occur when exploitable resources are available. We tested this hypothesis in two species of spadefoot toads (Spea bombifrons and S. multiplicata) whose tadpoles use phenotypic plasticity to develop into either an omnivore morph, which specializes on detritus, or a physically distinctive carnivore morph, which specializes on shrimp. Both species grow best on shrimp, but when reared together, S. bombifrons outcompetes S. multiplicata for shrimp and S. multiplicata outcompetes S. bombifrons for detritus. We found that when each species occurred alone in the field, they produced similar proportions of omnivores and carnivores. When the two species occurred together, however, they underwent ecological character displacement in larval development, with S. multiplicata producing mostly omnivores, and S. bombifrons producing mostly carnivores. We combined observations of natural populations with experiments to evaluate whether such character displacement was only possible when both shrimp and detritus were relatively abundant. Mixed-species ponds contained abundant detritus and shrimp, in contrast with nearby pure-species ponds, which were deficient in one resource. Experiments revealed that S. multiplicata competed poorly when detritus was rare and that S. bombifrons competed poorly when shrimp was rare. In nature, when one of these two resources was scarce, one species was missing, perhaps through competitive exclusion by the species that was the superior competitor for the remaining resource. Thus, ecological character displacement and, therefore, coexistence of close competitors, was only possible when diverse resources were available. Finally, even if exploitable resources are available, character displacement is not guaranteed to transpire if species cannot utilize such resources expeditiously. Phenotypic plasticity provides a general and important mechanism for facilitating resource partitioning. Thus, by facilitating shifts in resource use, phenotypic plasticity and ecological opportunity may often interact to promote divergence and coexistence of competitors.
我们研究了资源可用性和表型可塑性在促进生态位分化(即物种间资源竞争导致的性状进化)中的作用。由于生态位分化会产生在资源利用上存在差异的新种群,所以这个过程应该只在有可利用资源时才会发生。我们在两种锄足蟾(饰纹角蟾和多斑锄足蟾)中验证了这一假设,它们的蝌蚪利用表型可塑性发育成杂食形态(以碎屑为食)或形态独特的肉食形态(以虾为食)。两种蟾蜍在以虾为食时生长得最好,但当它们一起饲养时,饰纹角蟾在争夺虾的竞争中胜过多斑锄足蟾,而多斑锄足蟾在争夺碎屑的竞争中胜过饰纹角蟾。我们发现,当每个物种单独出现在野外时,它们产生的杂食性和肉食性个体比例相似。然而,当这两个物种一起出现时,它们在幼体发育过程中经历了生态位分化,多斑锄足蟾大多发育成杂食性个体,而饰纹角蟾大多发育成肉食性个体。我们将对自然种群的观察与实验相结合,以评估这种生态位分化是否只有在虾和碎屑都相对丰富时才有可能发生。与附近缺少一种资源的纯种池塘相比,混合物种池塘中碎屑和虾都很丰富。实验表明,当碎屑稀少时,多斑锄足蟾竞争力较弱;当虾稀少时,饰纹角蟾竞争力较弱。在自然界中,当这两种资源中的一种稀缺时,其中一个物种就会消失,可能是被在剩余资源竞争中占优势的物种通过竞争排斥掉了。因此,只有当有多种资源可用时,生态位分化以及近缘竞争者的共存才有可能。最后,即使有可利用资源,如果物种不能迅速利用这些资源,生态位分化也不一定会发生。表型可塑性为促进资源分配提供了一种普遍且重要的机制。因此,通过促进资源利用的转变,表型可塑性和生态机遇可能经常相互作用,以促进竞争者的分化和共存。