Rodríguez Falces Javier, Malanda Trigueros Armando, Gila Useros Luis, Rodríguez Carreño Ignacio, Navallas Irujo Javier
Universidad Pública de Navarra D.I.E.E. Campus de Arrosadía, 31006 Pamplona, Spain.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2006 Apr;53(4):581-92. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2006.870257.
The single-fiber action potential (SFAP) can be modeled as a convolution of a biolectrical source (the excitation) and a transfer function, representing the electrical volume conduction. In the Dimitrov-Dimitrova (D-D) convolutional model, the first temporal derivative of the intracellular action potential (IAP) is used as the source. In this model, the ratio between the amplitudes of the second and first phases of the SFAP (which we call the PPR, after peak-to-peak ratio) increases invariably with radial distance. This is not the case of real recorded fibrillation potentials (FPs). Moreover, FPs show a wider PPR range than that which the D-D model can provide. These discrepancies suggest that the D-D model should be revised. Since the volume conduction parameters seem to have no apparent effects on the PPR, we assume that the origin of this difference lies in the excitation source. This paper presents a new analytical description of the IAP based on that expressed in the D-D model. The new approximation is shown to model FPs with a range of PPRs comparable to that observed in a set of real FPs which we used as our test signals.
单纤维动作电位(SFAP)可被建模为生物电源(兴奋)与代表电容积传导的传递函数的卷积。在迪米特罗夫 - 迪米特罗娃(D - D)卷积模型中,细胞内动作电位(IAP)的一阶时间导数被用作源。在该模型中,SFAP第二相与第一相的幅度之比(我们在峰峰值比之后称之为PPR)总是随着径向距离增加。实际记录的颤动电位(FPs)并非如此。此外,FPs显示出比D - D模型所能提供的更宽的PPR范围。这些差异表明D - D模型应予以修正。由于容积传导参数似乎对PPR没有明显影响,我们假设这种差异的根源在于兴奋源。本文基于D - D模型中表达的内容,给出了IAP的一种新的解析描述。新的近似方法被证明能够对PPR范围与我们用作测试信号的一组实际FPs中观察到的范围相当的FPs进行建模。