Hageman Nina, Aronsen Trine, Tiselius Hans-Göran
Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(2):149-54. doi: 10.1080/00365590500498190.
To evaluate the clinical use of a simple device (Hemostick) developed to enable a standardized description of the degree of macroscopic haematuria.
The visual scale (Hemostick) used in this study comprised six colour fields, one yellow (blank; 0) and five with different nuances of red (1-5) selected from a colour scale according to clinical observations of samples obtained from patients with macroscopic haematuria. Urine samples containing blood were examined and given a Hemostick score (HS) of 0-5, based on comparison with the colour fields on the scale. In three experimental series, (A) 63, (B + C) 14 and (D) 60 x 4 urine samples were examined by observers. The reported HS was compared with the personal descriptions of the degree of haematuria. We also assessed the absorbance at 412 nm, the haemoglobin concentration and the number of erythrocytes.
In the first two series (A and B + C) comprising 325 observations on 77 urine samples, the HS for the same sample as reported by the observers was in agreement in 75-93% of cases. In Series B + C the coefficient of variation was 0.06 and the mode 2.68, which was almost identical to the observed mean HS value of 2.69. Based on observations on 240 urine samples considered by four observers during four consecutive days (Series D), an acceptable agreement was recorded in 74-94% of cases. In this experiment the mean HS differed from the mode by not more than 0.12-0.19. In terms of absorbance there was very good discrimination between samples with HSs 1, 2, 3 and 4. Measurements of the haemoglobin concentration (g/l) gave us the following approximate ranges for HSs 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4: <0.2, 0.2-1, 1-5, 5-25 and >25, respectively. Samples with HS 5 comprised those with a high concentration of old blood.
The results of this series of experiments involving scoring of macroscopic haematuria were encouraging. The Hemostick device was easy to use and resulted in a satisfactory consensus regarding the degree of haematuria and one that was superior to that deduced from a personal terminology.
评估一种为实现肉眼血尿程度标准化描述而研发的简易装置(Hemostick)的临床应用情况。
本研究中使用的视觉量表(Hemostick)包含六个色区,一个黄色(空白;0)以及五个根据肉眼血尿患者样本的临床观察从色标中选取的不同红色色调区域(1 - 5)。对含血的尿液样本进行检查,并根据与量表色区的比较给予Hemostick评分(HS)0 - 5分。在三个实验系列中,(A)63份、(B + C)14份以及(D)60×4份尿液样本由观察者进行检查。将报告的HS与肉眼血尿程度的个人描述进行比较。我们还评估了412nm处的吸光度、血红蛋白浓度以及红细胞数量。
在前两个系列(A和B + C)中,对77份尿液样本进行了325次观察,观察者报告的同一样本的HS在75% - 93%的情况下是一致的。在B + C系列中,变异系数为0.06,众数为2.68,这与观察到的平均HS值2.69几乎相同。基于四位观察者在连续四天内对240份尿液样本的观察(系列D),在74% - 94%的情况下记录到了可接受的一致性。在该实验中,平均HS与众数的差异不超过0.12 - 0.19。就吸光度而言,HS为1、2、3和4的样本之间有很好的区分度。血红蛋白浓度(g/l)的测量为HS 0、1、2、3和4给出了以下大致范围:分别为<0.2、0.2 - 1、1 - 5、5 - 25和>25。HS为5的样本包括那些含有高浓度陈旧血液的样本。
这一系列涉及肉眼血尿评分的实验结果令人鼓舞。Hemostick装置易于使用,并且在血尿程度方面达成了令人满意的共识,且优于从个人术语推导得出的结果。