Berry Donald A, Cirrincione Constance, Henderson I Craig, Citron Marc L, Budman Daniel R, Goldstein Lori J, Martino Silvana, Perez Edith A, Muss Hyman B, Norton Larry, Hudis Clifford, Winer Eric P
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA.
JAMA. 2006 Apr 12;295(14):1658-67. doi: 10.1001/jama.295.14.1658.
Breast cancer estrogen-receptor (ER) status is useful in predicting benefit from endocrine therapy. It may also help predict which patients benefit from advances in adjuvant chemotherapy.
To compare differences in benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy achieved by patients with ER-negative vs ER-positive tumors.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Trial data from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B and US Breast Cancer Intergroup analyzed; patient outcomes by ER status compared using hazards over time and multivariate models. Randomized trials comparing (1): 3 regimens of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (January 1985 to April 1991); (2) 3 doses of doxorubicin concurrent with cyclophosphamide, with or without subsequent paclitaxel (May 1994 to April 1997); (3) sequential doxorubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide with concurrent doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel, and also 3-week vs 2-week cycles (September 1997 to March 1999). A total of 6644 node-positive breast cancer patients received adjuvant treatment.
Disease-free and overall survival.
For ER-negative tumors, chemotherapy improvements reduced the relative risk of recurrence by 21%, 25%, and 23% in the 3 studies, respectively, and 55% comparing the lowest dose in the first study with biweekly cycles in the third study. Corresponding relative risk reductions for ER-positive tumors treated with tamoxifen were 9%, 12%, and 8% in the 3 studies, and 26% overall. The overall mortality rate reductions associated with chemotherapy improvements were 55% and 23% among ER-negative and ER-positive patients, respectively. All individual ER-negative comparisons and no ER-positive comparisons were statistically significant. Absolute benefits due to chemotherapy were greater for patients with ER-negative compared with ER-positive tumors: 22.8% more ER-negative patients survived to 5 years disease-free if receiving chemotherapy vs 7.0% for ER-positive patients; corresponding improvements for overall survival were 16.7% vs 4.0%.
Among patients with node-positive tumors, ER-negative breast cancer, biweekly doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide plus paclitaxel lowers the rate of recurrence and death by more than 50% in comparison with low-dose cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil as used in the first study.
乳腺癌雌激素受体(ER)状态有助于预测内分泌治疗的获益情况。它或许还能帮助预测哪些患者能从辅助化疗的进展中获益。
比较ER阴性与ER阳性肿瘤患者辅助化疗获益的差异。
设计、研究地点和患者:分析癌症与白血病B组及美国乳腺癌协作组的试验数据;根据ER状态比较患者预后,采用时间风险和多变量模型。随机试验比较了:(1)环磷酰胺、阿霉素和氟尿嘧啶的3种方案(1985年1月至1991年4月);(2)阿霉素3种剂量与环磷酰胺同时使用,有或无后续紫杉醇治疗(1994年5月至1997年4月);(3)序贯使用阿霉素、紫杉醇和环磷酰胺,同时使用阿霉素和环磷酰胺后接紫杉醇,以及3周与2周疗程(1997年9月至1999年3月)。共有6644例淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者接受了辅助治疗。
无病生存期和总生存期。
对于ER阴性肿瘤,在3项研究中,化疗改进分别将复发相对风险降低了21%、25%和23%,将第一项研究中的最低剂量与第三项研究中的双周疗程相比,复发相对风险降低了55%。在3项研究中,接受他莫昔芬治疗的ER阳性肿瘤的相应复发相对风险降低分别为9%、12%和8%,总体降低26%。化疗改进使ER阴性和ER阳性患者的总体死亡率分别降低了55%和23%。所有ER阴性个体比较均有统计学意义,而ER阳性个体比较均无统计学意义。与ER阳性肿瘤患者相比,ER阴性肿瘤患者化疗带来的绝对获益更大:接受化疗的ER阴性患者5年无病生存率比ER阳性患者高22.8%;总体生存率的相应改善分别为16.7%和4.0%。
在淋巴结阳性肿瘤患者中,与第一项研究中使用的低剂量环磷酰胺、阿霉素和氟尿嘧啶相比,ER阴性乳腺癌患者使用双周阿霉素/环磷酰胺加紫杉醇可使复发率和死亡率降低50%以上。