Miller Brett, Juhasz Barbara J, Rayner Keith
Haskins Laboratories, St. New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
Br J Psychol. 2006 May;97(Pt 2):191-216. doi: 10.1348/000712605X66845.
Recent research found that naming and lexical decision times for words with an early orthographic uniqueness point (OUP) were faster than for words with a late OUP (Kwantes & Mewhort, 1999a; Lindell, Nicholls, & Castles, 2003). A word's OUP corresponds to the letter position in the word where that word is differentiated from other words. These results have been presented as evidence for sequential letter processing in visual word recognition (Kwantes & Mewhort, 1999a). In two experiments, we attempted to extend these results to a more natural reading situation by recording participants' eye movements. Readers read sentences with early or late OUP words embedded in them. In both experiments, we manipulated the amount of parafoveal information available during reading. Readers did not show any consistent benefit for reading words with an early OUP regardless of the amount of preview available. Our results are at odds with the naming and lexical decision data and prove problematic for models that predict OUP effects.
最近的研究发现,对于具有早期正字法独特点(OUP)的单词,其命名和词汇判断时间比具有晚期OUP的单词要快(夸恩茨和梅霍特,1999a;林德尔、尼科尔斯和卡斯尔斯,2003)。一个单词的OUP对应于该单词中与其他单词区分开来的字母位置。这些结果被作为视觉单词识别中顺序字母处理的证据(夸恩茨和梅霍特,1999a)。在两项实验中,我们试图通过记录参与者的眼动,将这些结果扩展到更自然的阅读情境中。读者阅读嵌入了早期或晚期OUP单词的句子。在两项实验中,我们都操纵了阅读过程中可用的副中央凹信息的数量。无论可用的预视量如何,读者在阅读具有早期OUP的单词时都没有表现出任何一致的优势。我们的结果与命名和词汇判断数据不一致,并且对预测OUP效应的模型来说是个问题。