Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.
作者信息
Saks E R
机构信息
University of Southern California Law Center, USA.
出版信息
Univ Miami Law Rev. 1993 Jan;47(3):689-761.
PMID:16617526
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Competency to refuse psychotropic medication: three alternatives to the law's cognitive standard.拒绝使用精神药物的能力：法律认知标准的三种替代方案
Univ Miami Law Rev. 1993 Jan;47(3):689-761.
2
3
Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.刑事审判过程中的精神药物：里金斯诉内华达州案的宪法及治疗学意义
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights. 1993;10(Part 3):637-709.
4
What medical school did you graduate from? Judicial prescribing of medical treatments.你毕业于哪所医学院？医疗治疗的司法处方。
J Psychiatry Law. 2000 Summer;28(2):215-33.
5
Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.审判权利与精神药物：反对在审判期间对被告进行非自愿药物治疗的案例。
Vanderbilt Law Rev. 2002;55(1):165-218.
6
Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.为使被告具备受审能力而进行的强制药物治疗：塞尔案后法律的最新情况
Georget J Leg Ethics. 2004 Summer;17(4):813-26.
7
Competency to refuse lifesaving treatment: valuing the nonlogical aspects of a person's decisions.拒绝救生治疗的能力：重视个人决策中的非逻辑因素。
Issues Law Med. 1994 Winter;10(3):299-320.
8
Forcible medication for courtroom competence--the case of Charles Sell.为判定法庭行为能力而进行的强制药物治疗——查尔斯·塞尔案
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2297-301. doi: 10.1056/NEJMlim033389.
9
Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Law Psychol Rev. 1993 Spring;17:41-83.
10
Sell v. U.S.: involuntary treatment case or catalyst for change?塞尔诉美国案：非自愿治疗案例还是变革的催化剂？
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33(3):292-4.
Zotero 插件