Scheiblauer Heiner, Soboll Heidemarie, Nick Sigrid
Testing Laboratory for in-vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI-IVD), Paul-Ehrlich-Strasse, Langen, Germany.
J Med Virol. 2006;78 Suppl 1:S66-70. doi: 10.1002/jmv.20611.
Seventeen HBsAg assays, in use in the European market (CE-marked), were assessed for their diagnostic sensitivity using 38 commercially available seroconversion panels, and for their analytical sensitivity with the HBsAg ad and ay standards of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI). In addition, the ability to detect HBsAg mutants was investigated by means of 21 recombinant HBsAg mutant samples and 5 natural mutants. Analysis of seroconversion data revealed that there were marked differences in the sensitivity among the CE-marked HBsAg assays. Differences in the window period between the most and the least sensitive assays were up to 2 weeks. Analytical sensitivities of the investigated assays ranged from 0.009 to 0.05 PEI-U/ml for HBsAg ad standard (relating to approximately 0.018 to 0.100 IU/ml of the 2nd WHO HBsAg standard) and 0.012 to 0.11 PEI-U/ml for the ay standard. Clinical and analytical sensitivities were basically correlated. The capacity to detect mutant HBsAg forms was influenced by the assay format and the properties of the monoclonal antibodies used for coating of the solid phase or in the conjugate. While some assays detected all mutants others exhibited weaknesses especially in recognising HBsAg mutations affecting loop 2 of the HBsAg a-determinant. The results obtained with the recombinant mutants were largely confirmed by the investigation of clinical samples. The study gives a broad overview of the current state of the art of about 70% of the HBsAg assays currently available in Europe. The overall sensitivity has not been improved further since 1995 when the most sensitive assay was introduced into the market. In addition, detection of HBsAg mutants seems problematic with several assays. It is concluded that there is potential to improve clinical sensitivity and mutant recognition of HBsAg assays.
对欧洲市场上使用的(有CE标志)17种乙肝表面抗原(HBsAg)检测方法,利用38种市售血清转化检测板评估其诊断敏感性,并采用保罗 - 埃利希研究所(PEI)的HBsAg ad和ay标准评估其分析敏感性。此外,通过21个重组HBsAg突变体样本和5个天然突变体研究检测HBsAg突变体的能力。血清转化数据分析显示,有CE标志的HBsAg检测方法在敏感性上存在显著差异。最敏感和最不敏感检测方法之间的窗口期差异高达2周。所研究检测方法对HBsAg ad标准的分析敏感性范围为0.009至0.05 PEI - U/ml(约相当于世界卫生组织第二版HBsAg标准的0.018至0.100 IU/ml),对ay标准的分析敏感性范围为0.012至0.11 PEI - U/ml。临床敏感性和分析敏感性基本相关。检测突变型HBsAg形式的能力受检测方法形式以及用于包被固相或偶联物的单克隆抗体特性影响。虽然有些检测方法能检测到所有突变体,但其他方法存在不足,尤其是在识别影响HBsAg a决定簇环2的HBsAg突变方面。重组突变体的检测结果在很大程度上得到了临床样本研究的证实。该研究对欧洲目前约70%的HBsAg检测方法的现有技术水平进行了全面概述。自1995年最敏感的检测方法投放市场以来,总体敏感性未进一步提高。此外,几种检测方法对HBsAg突变体的检测似乎存在问题。结论是,提高HBsAg检测方法的临床敏感性和突变体识别能力具有潜力。