Naito Hidemune
Suzuka University of Medical Science, Suzuka, and Naito Medical Research Institute, Kobe, Japan.
Perit Dial Int. 2006 Mar-Apr;26(2):155-61.
Like most countries, Japan is facing constraints on expansion of health system financial resources. There are almost 250000 Japanese patients with end-stage renal disease and almost all are managed by chronic dialysis. Hospital hemodialysis is the modality used by 96% of these patients. The Japanese health-care system has tended to support resource-intensive treatments because the fee-for-service remuneration system has rewarded their utilization. This has benefited hemodialysis at the expense of peritoneal dialysis. However, this may now be changing. Case management and global budget-related approaches are being more widely introduced, as are incentives to reward more efficient treatment options. The relative costs of dialysis modalities are difficult to appreciate, as center-based services, such as hospital hemodialysis, are dependent upon fixed resources, while home-based options, such as peritoneal dialysis, are dependent upon variable resources. The aim of this review is to reconcile various sources of information relevant to end-stage renal disease funding in Japan. The review will suggest that modifying the approach to modality selection could lead to more efficient allocation of future dialysis-related resources and so reduce the strain on Japan's health-care budget.
与大多数国家一样,日本在扩大卫生系统财政资源方面面临制约。日本有近25万名终末期肾病患者,几乎所有人都接受慢性透析治疗。其中96%的患者采用医院血液透析方式。日本医疗保健系统倾向于支持资源密集型治疗,因为按服务收费的薪酬体系对这类治疗的使用给予了回报。这是以腹膜透析为代价使血液透析受益。然而,这种情况现在可能正在改变。病例管理和与全球预算相关的方法正在更广泛地推行,奖励更高效治疗方案的激励措施也在推行。透析方式的相对成本难以评估,因为诸如医院血液透析等基于中心的服务依赖固定资源,而诸如腹膜透析等居家选择则依赖可变资源。本综述的目的是梳理与日本终末期肾病资金相关的各种信息来源。该综述将表明,改变透析方式选择方法可能会使未来与透析相关的资源得到更有效分配,从而减轻日本医疗保健预算的压力。