Siddiqui Zarrin Seema
Department of Medical Education, University of Western Australia, WA 6009, Perth, Australia.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006 Apr;16(4):291-3.
Medical education is regularly challenged with new and innovative ideas in the field of curricula, teaching learning processes and assessment. Evaluation of these approaches and techniques provide vital information regarding their subsequent use and application to enhance the quality of learning experiences for students. Therefore, it is essentially important to choose an evaluation approach/model that provide meaningful and valid information to concerned stakeholders. Here two major paradigm of evaluation i.e. scientific and naturalistic are discussed emphasizing on their use, strengths and limitations. It is concluded that no single paradigm is superior to other and it is finally left to the evaluator for making the ultimate choice depending on the purpose and questions that need to be answered through evaluation.
医学教育在课程、教学过程和评估领域经常面临新的创新理念的挑战。对这些方法和技术的评估提供了有关其后续使用和应用的重要信息,以提高学生的学习体验质量。因此,选择一种能为相关利益者提供有意义且有效信息的评估方法/模型至关重要。这里讨论了两种主要的评估范式,即科学范式和自然主义范式,重点介绍了它们的用途、优点和局限性。得出的结论是,没有一种范式优于另一种范式,最终取决于评估者根据评估目的和需要回答的问题做出最终选择。