• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对限制护士参与研究的因素的探索。

An exploration of factors which constrain nurses from research participation.

作者信息

Roxburgh Michelle

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland.

出版信息

J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):535-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01374.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01374.x
PMID:16629962
Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study was to explore practising nurses' views on factors which they perceived constrained them from research participation.

BACKGROUND

Many studies reviewed in the literature have taken a quantitative approach and have concentrated on why nurses do not use research findings in their practice. Of these studies a few included constraints to research use. However, with the development of national research strategies for nursing and the drive for the profession to develop its own research base, there is a need to understand what constrains clinically practising nurses from taking up opportunities to either develop their own research or participate in research studies.

DESIGN AND METHOD

Data were collected during June and July 2004 by means of two focus groups (n=7) followed by single interviews (n=7). Analysis was undertaken using a thematic approach aided by N-Vivo 2.0.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In this study, findings revealed six key themes perceived by nurses to constrain from research participation: 'Level of support nurses require to be research active', 'Nurses' attitudes to undertaking/participating in research', 'The extent of nurses knowledge about research', 'Skills to undertake research' and 'Level of educational preparation relating to undertaking/participating in research'.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, nurses were generally receptive to participating in research. However, they felt constrained because of lack of time, lack of peer support and limited knowledge and skills of the research process.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

What is already known on this topic: studies into nurses and research have predominantly taken a quantitative approach; many studies have aimed to elicit the extent of nurses' use of research findings.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

this study adds a qualitative perspective; although findings are not generalizable, they support quantitative study findings into this subject; identifies constraints that require to be overcome for practising nurses to actively get involved in research studies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨执业护士对那些他们认为阻碍其参与研究的因素的看法。

背景

文献中回顾的许多研究采用了定量方法,并且集中于护士为何不在实践中运用研究结果。在这些研究中,少数研究涉及了研究运用的限制因素。然而,随着国家护理研究战略的发展以及该行业建立自身研究基础的推动,有必要了解是什么阻碍临床执业护士抓住机会开展自己的研究或参与研究项目。

设计与方法

2004年6月和7月期间,通过两个焦点小组(n = 7)随后进行个别访谈(n = 7)收集数据。采用主题分析法并借助N - Vivo 2.0进行分析。

结果与讨论

在本研究中,结果揭示了护士认为阻碍参与研究的六个关键主题:“护士积极参与研究所需的支持水平”、“护士对开展/参与研究的态度”、“护士对研究的了解程度”、“开展研究的技能”以及“与开展/参与研究相关的教育准备水平”。

结论

在本研究中,护士总体上愿意参与研究。然而,他们感到受限是因为时间不足、缺乏同行支持以及对研究过程的知识和技能有限。

与临床实践的相关性

关于该主题已有的了解:对护士与研究的研究主要采用定量方法;许多研究旨在了解护士运用研究结果的程度。

本研究的补充内容

本研究增加了定性视角;尽管研究结果不可推广,但它们支持了关于该主题的定量研究结果;确定了执业护士积极参与研究项目需要克服的限制因素。

相似文献

1
An exploration of factors which constrain nurses from research participation.对限制护士参与研究的因素的探索。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 May;15(5):535-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01374.x.
2
Fit for practice? An exploration of the development of newly qualified nurses using focus groups.适合实践吗?通过焦点小组对新入职护士发展情况的探索。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1210-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
3
Nurses' perceptions, understanding and experiences of health promotion.护士对健康促进的认知、理解与经验
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1039-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.01640.x.
4
Professional competence: factors described by nurses as influencing their development.专业能力:护士描述的影响其职业发展的因素。
Int Nurs Rev. 2006 Mar;53(1):66-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2006.00432.x.
5
'It's not like the wards'. Experiences of nurses new to critical care: a qualitative study.“这和病房不一样”。新入职重症监护病房护士的经历:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Mar;43(3):319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.04.007. Epub 2005 Jul 18.
6
Predictors of nurses' perceptions of barriers to research utilization.护士对研究应用障碍认知的预测因素
J Nurs Manag. 2008 Apr;16(3):305-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00770.x.
7
Spiritual care: implications for nurses' professional responsibility.精神关怀:对护士职业责任的启示
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Jul;15(7):875-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01615.x.
8
Competence of Romanian nurses after their first six months in Italy: a descriptive study.罗马尼亚护士在意大利工作头六个月后的能力:一项描述性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Dec;16(12):2260-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01647.x. Epub 2007 Feb 22.
9
Swedish Registered Nurses' incentives to use nursing diagnoses in clinical practice.瑞典注册护士在临床实践中使用护理诊断的动机。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Aug;15(8):936-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01459.x.
10
The mixed attitudes of nurse's to caring for people with mental illness in a rural general hospital.乡村综合医院护士对护理精神疾病患者的复杂态度。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2005 Dec;14(4):249-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0979.2005.00389.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Jordanian nurses' attitudes toward conducting nursing research: cross-sectional study from Jordan.探索约旦护士对开展护理研究的态度:来自约旦的横断面研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 30;12:1646739. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1646739. eCollection 2025.
2
Teaching in the Digital Age-Developing a Support Program for Nursing Education Providers: Design-Based Research.数字时代的教学——为护理教育提供者开发支持项目:基于设计的研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jan 15;9:e66109. doi: 10.2196/66109.
3
Developing a community-responsive research model in the healthcare system: a mixed-method study.
在医疗保健系统中开发社区响应式研究模型:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 May 25;24(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02250-1.
4
A review of stress management interventions for the oncology nursing workforce: What do we know and what should we be doing differently?肿瘤护理人员压力管理干预措施综述:我们了解什么,又应该做出哪些不同的改变?
Health Psychol Rep. 2020 Nov 9;9(4):289-307. doi: 10.5114/hpr.2020.100787. eCollection 2021.
5
Nurse and allied health professional experiences and attitudes toward critical care research: A national questionnaire study.护士及相关健康专业人员对重症监护研究的经历与态度:一项全国性问卷调查研究。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Feb;23(1):2-10. doi: 10.1177/1751143720968659. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Audiovisual Recording in the Inpatient Setting: A Method for Studying Parent-Nurse Communication.住院环境中的视听记录:一种研究父母-护士沟通的方法。
J Fam Nurs. 2023 May;29(2):192-201. doi: 10.1177/10748407231162131.
7
Access, Utilization, and Implementation of Research Among Rehabilitation Nurses: A Qualitative Study.康复护士对研究的获取、利用和实施:一项定性研究。
Rehabil Nurs. 2022;47(3):99-108. doi: 10.1097/RNJ.0000000000000367. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
8
Repairing our broken relationship with the vaccine hesitant: Empathy, compassion, and humility are needed.修复我们与疫苗犹豫者之间破裂的关系:需要同理心、同情心和谦逊。
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Mar;68(3):211-213. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6803211.
9
Exploring Suicidal Ideation Using an Innovative Mobile App-Strength Within Me: The Usability and Acceptability of Setting up a Trial Involving Mobile Technology and Mental Health Service Users.使用创新移动应用程序“我内心的力量”探索自杀意念:开展一项涉及移动技术和心理健康服务使用者的试验的可用性和可接受性
JMIR Ment Health. 2020 Sep 28;7(9):e18407. doi: 10.2196/18407.
10
Recruitment Strategies for Nurse Enrollment in an Online Study.招募护士参与在线研究的策略。
Nurs Res. 2020 Jan/Feb;69(1):69-73. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000393.