Martins Castro Manuel Carlos, Luders Cláudio, Elias Rosilene Motta, Abensur Hugo, Romão Junior João Egidio
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP, Divisão de Nefrologia, Av Dr Enéas Carvalho de Aguiar, 2557 andar ICHC, sala 7080, CEP 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Aug;21(8):2232-8. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfl171. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
In conventional haemodialysis (CHD), the morbidity and mortality rate is unacceptably high; consequently, variations in the length and frequency of the haemodialysis sessions have been studied to reduce the complications of dialysis treatment. In this sense, high-efficiency short daily haemodialysis (SDHD) has been proposed as an alternative for patients on renal replacement therapy. In this study, we have related our experience with this dialysis modality.
Twenty-six patients (16 males, mean age 35.6 +/- 14.7 years) were treated by SDHD for 33.6 +/- 18.5 months (range 6-57 months). The mean time on CHD before the switch to SDHD was 25.5 +/- 31.9 months (range 1-159 months). In 23 (88.5%) patients, native arteriovenous fistulae were used for vascular access. SDHD was performed six times a week, 1.5-2 h per session, and high flux polysulfone dialysers (surface area: 1.8 m(2)) were employed. The blood flow and dialysate flow rate were 350 and 800 ml/min, respectively.
In this trial, the patient survival was 100%. The vascular access survival after 12, 24, 36 and 48 months on SDHD was 100, 89, 89 and 80%, respectively. There were three failures of vascular access in 72.7 patient-years (0.04 failures/patient-year). In 15 patients on SDHD during 36 consecutive months, the vascular access survival after 12, 24, 36 and 48 months was 100, 93, 93 and 84%, respectively. Also, in this group of patients, there were 0.27 hospitalizations/patient-year and 1.24 days of hospitalizations/patient-year.
We concluded that in a long-time study of patients on SDHD the morbidity and mortality rate is very low. Furthermore, we observed that failures of vascular access are not a significant problem. Consequently, we believe that SDHD is a powerful renal replacement therapy for treatment of patients on maintenance haemodialysis.
在传统血液透析(CHD)中,发病率和死亡率高得令人难以接受;因此,人们对血液透析疗程的时长和频率变化进行了研究,以减少透析治疗的并发症。从这个意义上讲,高效每日短时血液透析(SDHD)已被提议作为肾脏替代治疗患者的一种选择。在本研究中,我们介绍了我们在这种透析方式上的经验。
26例患者(16例男性,平均年龄35.6±14.7岁)接受了33.6±18.5个月(范围6 - 57个月)的SDHD治疗。转为SDHD前接受CHD治疗的平均时间为25.5±31.9个月(范围1 - 159个月)。23例(88.5%)患者使用自体动静脉内瘘作为血管通路。SDHD每周进行6次,每次1.5 - 2小时,并使用高通量聚砜透析器(表面积:1.8平方米)。血流速度和透析液流速分别为350和800毫升/分钟。
在本试验中,患者生存率为100%。接受SDHD治疗12、24、36和48个月后的血管通路生存率分别为100%、89%、89%和80%。在72.7患者年中有3次血管通路失败(0.04次/患者年)。在连续36个月接受SDHD治疗的15例患者中,12、24、36和48个月后的血管通路生存率分别为100%、93%、93%和84%。此外,在这组患者中,住院率为0.27次/患者年,住院天数为1.24天/患者年。
我们得出结论,在对接受SDHD治疗的患者进行的长期研究中,发病率和死亡率非常低。此外,我们观察到血管通路失败不是一个重大问题。因此,我们认为SDHD是一种用于维持性血液透析患者治疗的有效肾脏替代疗法。