Suppr超能文献

针对创伤后应激障碍的结构化访谈能否辅助机动车事故后的临床决策?一项探索性分析。

Can structured interviews for posttraumatic stress disorder assist clinical decision-making after motor vehicle accidents? An exploratory analysis.

作者信息

Silove Derrick, Brooks Robert, Steel Zachary, Blaszczynski Alex, Hillman Ken, Tyndall Karen

机构信息

Psychiatry Research and Teaching Unit, School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, and Centre for Population Mental Health Research, Sydney South West Area Health Service, New South Wales 2170, Australia.

出版信息

Compr Psychiatry. 2006 May-Jun;47(3):194-200. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2005.08.004.

Abstract

Motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) represent one of the most common causes of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) worldwide. Predicting those MVA survivors who are likely to experience PTSD in the longer-term has attracted substantial research attention, but most investigators have concluded that early traumatic stress symptoms have only moderate predictive power. The present study focuses on a decision-tree approach that might be useful to clinicians attempting to identify subgroups of MVA survivors with graduated degrees of risk. Eighty-three consecutive MVA admissions (response rate, 65%) were assessed by structured clinical interview within 2 weeks of the accident and at 18 months follow-up. Meeting full criteria for PTSD (other than the time criterion) at baseline achieved a positive predictive power of 0.92 in identifying those who had PTSD over the following 18 months. For the remainder, the PTSD "arousal" domain achieved a positive predictive power of 0.81 for predicting those with either subthreshold PTSD or full PTSD over the 18-month follow-up period. The implications for further research into a stepped approach to intervention and monitoring are discussed.

摘要

机动车事故(MVA)是全球创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)最常见的病因之一。预测哪些机动车事故幸存者在较长时期内可能会出现创伤后应激障碍已引起了大量研究关注,但大多数研究者得出的结论是,早期创伤应激症状的预测能力仅为中等。本研究聚焦于一种决策树方法,这可能对临床医生识别具有不同风险程度的机动车事故幸存者亚组有用。连续83例机动车事故入院患者(应答率65%)在事故发生后2周内及18个月随访时接受了结构化临床访谈。在基线时符合创伤后应激障碍的全部标准(时间标准除外),在识别接下来18个月内患有创伤后应激障碍的患者方面,阳性预测能力达到0.92。对于其余患者,创伤后应激障碍的“觉醒”领域在预测18个月随访期内患有阈下创伤后应激障碍或完全创伤后应激障碍的患者方面,阳性预测能力达到0.81。本文讨论了对干预和监测的分步方法进行进一步研究的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验