Purcell Stephen D
Int J Psychoanal. 2006 Feb;87(Pt 1):105-23.
The author believes that unconscious sexual excitement in the transference and countertransference is an especially problematic aspect of the analysis of perverse character pathology and that perverse sexual gratification deserves a more prominent position in the clinical theory of analyzing perversion than that which has been assigned tacitly through analysts' routine focus on the defensive and destructive dynamics of perversion. He presents clinical material from the analysis of a perverse patient that illustrates the role of excitement in the transference perversion established in this analysis; and he asserts that gratifying perverse enactments occurring in the transference perversion can appear not only as conscious or unconscious excitement in the transference but also, at times most clearly, as the analyst's excitement. The author suggests that using a clinical theory that supports the analyst in understanding his excited responses as perverse countertransferences--i.e. evoked excitement complementary to the sexual component of a perverse transference--will assist him in locating and thinking about gratifying, perverse excitement in the transference where it is most usefully analyzed. Finally, he discusses some of the reasons why analysts might deny, suppress or otherwise avoid perverse countertransferences and in so doing contribute to sustaining perverse resistances.
作者认为,移情和反移情中无意识的性兴奋是分析变态性格病理学的一个特别有问题的方面,而且变态性满足在变态分析的临床理论中应占据比分析师通过常规关注变态的防御和破坏动力而默认赋予的更为突出的地位。他呈现了对一名变态患者分析的临床资料,这些资料说明了兴奋在本次分析中所建立的移情变态中的作用;并且他断言,在移情变态中发生的满足性变态行为不仅可以表现为移情中意识层面或无意识层面的兴奋,而且有时最明显地表现为分析师的兴奋。作者建议,运用一种临床理论,支持分析师将其兴奋反应理解为变态反移情——即与变态移情的性成分互补的诱发兴奋——将有助于他在最有利于分析的移情中定位并思考满足性的、变态的兴奋。最后,他讨论了分析师可能否认、压抑或以其他方式回避变态反移情并因此助长变态抵抗的一些原因。