Suppr超能文献

无皮肤切口的经皮内镜下胃造口术置管:一项随机试验的结果

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement without skin incision: results of a randomized trial.

作者信息

Sedlack Robert E, Pochron Nichole L, Baron Todd H

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006 May-Jun;30(3):240-5. doi: 10.1177/0148607106030003240.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

During percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement, skin incision is performed as standard practice. We suspected that this time-honored principle is unnecessary.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized trial, 50 adults undergoing PEG placement were randomized to skin incision omission PEG (IOPEG) and standard PEG (SPEG). Two- and 7-day PEG site evaluations were performed to grade stomal infection, bleeding, pain, and overall satisfaction using a standardized scoring system. Median stomal evaluation scores were compared between groups using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Completion rates were compared using a t-test.

RESULTS

Placement success for the IOPEG and SPEG technique was 22/25 (88%) and 24/25 (96%), respectively (p = NS). Three failed IOPEG attempts required an incision to complete due to increased pull force encountered. One SPEG failed due to inability to transilluminate. Stomal evaluation scores of infection, bleeding, pain, leakage, and patient satisfaction were not significantly different at 2 or 7 days. No serious complications occurred as a result of skin incision omission.

CONCLUSIONS

Omitting the skin incision does not significantly alter the placement success rate, patient satisfaction, or the rate of stomal complications, thus dispelling the dogma that a skin incision is mandatory for PEG placement and the myth that incisions reduce infectious complications.

摘要

背景

在经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)置管过程中,进行皮肤切口是标准操作。我们怀疑这一由来已久的原则并无必要。

方法

在一项前瞻性随机试验中,50例接受PEG置管的成年人被随机分为免皮肤切口PEG组(IOPEG)和标准PEG组(SPEG)。采用标准化评分系统在术后2天和7天对PEG置管部位进行评估,以对造口感染、出血、疼痛和总体满意度进行分级。使用Wilcoxon秩和检验比较两组的造口评估中位数得分。使用t检验比较完成率。

结果

IOPEG技术和SPEG技术的置管成功率分别为22/25(88%)和24/25(96%)(p = 无统计学意义)。3例IOPEG置管尝试失败,由于遇到的拉力增加,需要切开皮肤才能完成置管。1例SPEG置管失败是由于无法进行透光检查。在术后2天或7天,造口的感染、出血、疼痛、渗漏评估得分及患者满意度并无显著差异。未因省略皮肤切口而出现严重并发症。

结论

省略皮肤切口并不会显著改变置管成功率、患者满意度或造口并发症发生率,从而打破了PEG置管必须进行皮肤切口的教条以及切口可减少感染并发症的误区。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验