Ertaş Nilgün Markal, Küçükçelebi Ahmet, Bozdoğan Nebil, Kurtay Atilla, Ozdil Kubilay, Celebioğlu Selim
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ankara Social Security Association Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Apr 15;117(5):1590-8. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000207399.68943.7c.
Treatment of recontractures that were previously skin grafted or treated with Z-plasty is a challenge. Application of a subsequent Z-plasty is risky because of the possibility of tip necrosis of the triangular flaps, whereas donor-site morbidity is undesirable if subsequent skin grafting is planned. The subcutaneous pedicle rhomboid flap is an effective technique for the treatment of every type of contracture. This article presents the clinical results of the rhomboid flap used in treatment of recontractures as an alternate technique to Z-plasty and skin grafting.
The authors operated on seven patients with recontractures (aged 4 to 45 years) using 19 rhomboid flaps. Flaps were applied in the upper extremity (seven flaps), lower extremity (five flaps), trunk (five flaps), neck (one flap), and axilla (one flap). Z-plasty scars were present in three locations, whereas skin grafting was previously applied in 16 locations. Preoperative rhomboid flap designs were made regardless of previous scars as single flaps in six locations and multiple flaps in 13 locations. Operations were performed under local and general anesthesia.
Patients were followed up for at least 6 months. All flaps achieved adequate relaxation postoperatively and healed uneventfully. The subcutaneous pedicle of the flap provided a distinct advantage in terms of vascularity. Recurrence was not seen in any of the patients.
The subcutaneous pedicle rhomboid flap is an effective and reliable technique for the treatment of recontractures. Preoperative planning is simple and independent of previous scars. Because the rhomboid flap resurfaces the emerged defects generated by relaxation incisions, one should consider that the flexibility of a single flap may not be adequate in some cases, and multiple flaps should be used.
治疗先前接受过植皮或Z成形术治疗的再挛缩是一项挑战。再次应用Z成形术存在风险,因为三角皮瓣可能出现尖端坏死,而如果计划再次植皮,供区并发症则是不可取的。皮下蒂菱形皮瓣是治疗各种类型挛缩的有效技术。本文介绍了菱形皮瓣作为Z成形术和植皮的替代技术用于治疗再挛缩的临床结果。
作者对7例再挛缩患者(年龄4至45岁)使用19个菱形皮瓣进行手术。皮瓣应用于上肢(7个皮瓣)、下肢(5个皮瓣)、躯干(5个皮瓣)、颈部(1个皮瓣)和腋窝(1个皮瓣)。Z成形术瘢痕出现在3个部位,而先前在16个部位进行过植皮。术前菱形皮瓣设计不考虑先前的瘢痕,6个部位为单皮瓣,13个部位为多皮瓣。手术在局部麻醉和全身麻醉下进行。
患者随访至少6个月。所有皮瓣术后均获得充分松弛,愈合良好。皮瓣的皮下蒂在血运方面具有明显优势。所有患者均未出现复发。
皮下蒂菱形皮瓣是治疗再挛缩的有效且可靠的技术。术前规划简单,且与先前瘢痕无关。由于菱形皮瓣可修复松弛切口产生的新出现的缺损,应考虑在某些情况下单皮瓣的灵活性可能不足,应使用多皮瓣。