Suppr超能文献

胸腰椎固定中,对椎板下钩作为椎板上钩替代物的生物力学评估。

A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.

作者信息

Murakami Hideki, Tsai Kai-Jow, Attallah-Wasif Emad S, Yamazaki Ken, Shimamura Tadashi, Hutton William C

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20;31(9):967-71. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214932.49027.6a.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical study, using human cadaveric spines, of two types of posterior fixation in the thoracolumbar spine.

OBJECTIVES

To compare fixation in the thoracolumbar spine using pedicle screws combined with infra-laminar hooks (at both the cranial and caudal ends of the same vertebra) with fixation using pedicle screws alone.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The standard method of using laminar hooks is to place supra-laminar hooks at the level above the vertebra being fixed by the cranial pedicle screws, and infra-laminar hooks at the level of the vertebra receiving the caudal pedicle screws. However, using this method, a single normal motion segment is killed. In the proposed technique, infra-laminar hooks will be used at the same level as the cranial pedicle screws, thus sparing the superior adjacent segment.

METHODS

PEDICLE SCREW LOOSENING TEST: Nine vertebrae (T9-L2) had pedicle screws inserted into both pedicles. On one side, the pedicle screw was connected to a fixation rod, while on the other side the pedicle screw was combined with an infra-laminar hook and connected to a rod. The rod on one side was then pushed with increasing force until loosening of the screw. The same test was repeated on the other rod until loosening of the screw. The reverse test (i.e., pulling until loosening) was done in a similar manner on another nine vertebrae. BIOMECHANICAL STIFFNESS TEST: Eight spines (T12-L2) were biomechanically tested in: axial compression, flexion, extension, left and right lateral bending, and left and right axial torsion. This sequence was applied to: 1) the intact spine; 2) after applying pedicle screws and infra-laminar hooks with rods to the destabilized spine; and 3) after removal of the hooks (with the pedicle screw and rods still inserted). From the load-deformation curves obtained, stiffness values were calculated.

RESULTS

PEDICLE SCREW LOOSENING TEST: The pedicle screw loosening tests showed that a pedicle screw combined with an infra-laminar hook offers significantly greater fixation strength as compared to a pedicle screw alone. Biomechanical stiffness test. Fixation by pedicle screws combined with infra-laminar hooks, placed on the vertebra fixed by pedicle screws at both the cranial and caudal ends, offered a stiffer construct as compared to fixation by pedicle screws alone.

CONCLUSIONS

This method offers a firm construct without sacrificing a normal motion segment.

摘要

研究设计

使用人体尸体脊柱对胸腰椎两种后路固定方式进行生物力学研究。

目的

比较使用椎弓根螺钉结合椎板下钩(在同一椎体的头端和尾端)与单纯使用椎弓根螺钉对胸腰椎进行固定的效果。

背景资料总结

使用椎板钩的标准方法是在由头端椎弓根螺钉固定的椎体上方水平放置椎板上钩,在接受尾端椎弓根螺钉的椎体水平放置椎板下钩。然而,使用这种方法会破坏一个正常的运动节段。在本研究提出的技术中,椎板下钩将与头端椎弓根螺钉处于同一水平,从而保留相邻的上位节段。

方法

椎弓根螺钉松动试验:在9个椎体(T9 - L2)的双侧椎弓根植入椎弓根螺钉。一侧,椎弓根螺钉连接到固定棒,而另一侧,椎弓根螺钉与椎板下钩结合并连接到棒上。然后以逐渐增加的力推一侧的棒,直到螺钉松动。对另一侧的棒重复相同试验,直到螺钉松动。对另外9个椎体以类似方式进行反向试验(即牵拉直到松动)。生物力学刚度试验:对8个脊柱标本(T12 - L2)进行生物力学测试,测试项目包括:轴向压缩、前屈、后伸、左右侧屈以及左右轴向扭转。该测试顺序应用于:1)完整脊柱;2)对失稳脊柱应用椎弓根螺钉和椎板下钩并连接棒之后;3)去除钩之后(椎弓根螺钉和棒仍保留)。根据获得的载荷 - 变形曲线计算刚度值。

结果

椎弓根螺钉松动试验:椎弓根螺钉松动试验表明,与单纯的椎弓根螺钉相比,结合椎板下钩的椎弓根螺钉具有显著更高的固定强度。生物力学刚度试验:在椎体的头端和尾端均由椎弓根螺钉固定,并结合椎板下钩,与单纯使用椎弓根螺钉固定相比,这种固定方式构建的结构更坚固。

结论

该方法可构建稳固结构,且不牺牲正常运动节段。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验