McAlpine Jessica N, Kelly Michael G, O'malley David M, Azodi Masoud, Coombe Karen, Schwartz Peter E, Rutherford Thomas J
Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Oct;103(1):288-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.007. Epub 2006 May 2.
Carboplatin skin testing (ST) can help identify patients with platinum hypersensitivity (PH), however, we have encountered patients who do not immediately test positive yet exhibit subtle or delayed allergy symptoms prior to PH. We describe the "atypical platinum reactions" (APH) of 14 patients and our experience with skin testing and desensitization.
Retrospective chart review was performed on carboplatin-treated patients. Patients with +ST, PH or APH were offered desensitization, and the number of successful additional treatments was recorded.
A total of 73 ST were administered to patients receiving their >6th carboplatin cycle. 19 +ST and 10 PH with -ST were identified. 14 APH were identified including delayed +ST conversions and allergy symptoms. The median onset and duration of symptoms after treatment were 6 and 3.5 days respectively. 12 APH patients had ST on their next cycle, seven of which were immediately positive. ST was positive in 36% of those tested, resulting in a negative predictive value of 76%. The median number of carboplatin cycles received prior to ST conversion, PH or APH was eight. 29% of patients with a +ST, PH, or APH had a prior history of systemic allergic reaction to other medications or allergens. Desensitization and dose escalation were successful in 14/20 patients (70%) for an average of 1.9 cycles/patient.
ST will not identify all patients with carboplatin-associated reactions. Careful questioning regarding symptoms in between chemotherapeutic cycles may identify patients who will benefit from desensitization, allowing continuation of treatment and prevention of life-threatening adverse events.
卡铂皮肤试验(ST)有助于识别铂类超敏反应(PH)患者,然而,我们遇到过一些患者,他们皮肤试验并非立即呈阳性,但在发生铂类超敏反应之前出现了轻微或延迟的过敏症状。我们描述了14例患者的“非典型铂类反应”(APH)以及我们在皮肤试验和脱敏治疗方面的经验。
对接受卡铂治疗的患者进行回顾性病历审查。对皮肤试验阳性(+ST)、铂类超敏反应(PH)或非典型铂类反应(APH)的患者进行脱敏治疗,并记录成功进行额外治疗的次数。
总共对接受第6个以上卡铂周期治疗的患者进行了73次皮肤试验。确定了19例皮肤试验阳性(+ST)和10例皮肤试验阴性(-ST)的铂类超敏反应(PH)患者。确定了14例非典型铂类反应(APH)患者,包括延迟的皮肤试验阳性转换和过敏症状。治疗后症状的中位发作时间和持续时间分别为6天和3.5天。12例非典型铂类反应(APH)患者在下一周期进行了皮肤试验,其中7例立即呈阳性。接受测试的患者中36%皮肤试验呈阳性,阴性预测值为76%。在皮肤试验转换为阳性、铂类超敏反应(PH)或非典型铂类反应(APH)之前接受的卡铂周期中位数为8个。29%皮肤试验阳性(+ST)、铂类超敏反应(PH)或非典型铂类反应(APH)的患者既往有对其他药物或过敏原的全身过敏反应史。14/20例患者(70%)脱敏和剂量递增成功,平均每位患者1.9个周期。
皮肤试验(ST)不能识别所有有卡铂相关反应的患者。在化疗周期之间仔细询问症状可能会识别出将从脱敏治疗中获益的患者,从而允许继续治疗并预防危及生命的不良事件。