Schrader L E, Ritenour G L, Eilrich G L, Hageman R H
Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801.
Plant Physiol. 1968 Jun;43(6):930-40. doi: 10.1104/pp.43.6.930.
With respect to cofactor requirements, NADH, and FMNH(2) were equally effective as electron donors for nitrate reductase obtained from leaves of maize, marrow, and spinach, when the cofactors were supplied in optimal concentrations. The concentration of FMNH(2) required to obtain half-maximal activity was from 40- to 100-fold higher than for NADH. For maximal activity with the corn enzyme, 0.8 millimolar FMNH(2) was required. In contrast, NADPH was functional only when supplied with NADP:reductase and exogenous FMN (enzymatic generation of FMNH(2)).All attempts to separate the NADH(2)- and FMNH(2)-dependent nitrate reductase activities were unsuccessful and regardless of cofactor used equal activities were obtained, if cofactor concentration was optimal. Unity of NADH to FMNH(2) activities were obtained during: A) purification procedures (4 step, 30-fold); B) induction of nitrate reductase in corn seedlings with nitrate; and C) inactivation of nitrate reductase in intact or excised corn seedlings. The NADH- and FMNH(2)-dependent activities were not additive.A half-life for nitrate reductase of approximately 4 hours was estimated from the inactivation studies with excised corn seedlings. Similar half-life values were obtained when seedlings were incubated at 35 degrees in a medium containing nitrate and cycloheximide (to inhibit protein synthesis), or when both nitrate and cycloheximide were omitted.In those instances where NADH activity but not FMNH(2) activity was lost due to treatment (temperature, removal of sulfhydryl agents, addition of p-chloromercuribenzoate), the loss could be explained by inactivation of the sulfhydryl group (s) required for NADH activity. This was verified by reactivation with exogenous cysteine.Based on these current findings, and previous work, it is concluded that nitrate reductase is a single moiety with the ability to utilize either NADH or FMNH(2) as cofactor. However the high concentration of FMNH(2) required for optimal activity suggests that in vivo NADH is the electron donor and that nitrate reductase in higher plants should be designated NADH:nitrate reductase (E.C. 1.6.6.1).
关于辅因子需求,当以最佳浓度提供辅因子时,NADH和FMNH₂作为从玉米、西葫芦和菠菜叶片中获得的硝酸还原酶的电子供体同样有效。获得最大活性一半时所需的FMNH₂浓度比NADH高40至100倍。对于玉米酶的最大活性,需要0.8毫摩尔FMNH₂。相比之下,NADPH只有在与NADP:还原酶和外源FMN一起提供时才有功能(酶促生成FMNH₂)。所有分离依赖NADH₂和FMNH₂的硝酸还原酶活性的尝试均未成功,并且如果辅因子浓度最佳,无论使用何种辅因子都能获得相同的活性。在以下情况下获得了NADH与FMNH₂活性的一致性:A)纯化过程(4步,30倍);B)用硝酸盐诱导玉米幼苗中的硝酸还原酶;C)完整或切除的玉米幼苗中硝酸还原酶的失活。依赖NADH和FMNH₂的活性不是相加的。从切除的玉米幼苗的失活研究中估计硝酸还原酶的半衰期约为4小时。当幼苗在含有硝酸盐和环己酰亚胺(抑制蛋白质合成)的培养基中于35摄氏度下孵育时,或者当同时省略硝酸盐和环己酰亚胺时,获得了类似的半衰期值。在那些由于处理(温度、去除巯基试剂、添加对氯汞苯甲酸)而NADH活性丧失但FMNH₂活性未丧失的情况下,这种丧失可以通过NADH活性所需的巯基失活来解释。这通过用外源半胱氨酸重新激活得到了验证。基于这些当前发现以及先前的工作,可以得出结论,硝酸还原酶是一个单一部分,能够利用NADH或FMNH₂作为辅因子。然而,最佳活性所需的FMNH₂高浓度表明,在体内NADH是电子供体,高等植物中的硝酸还原酶应称为NADH:硝酸还原酶(E.C. 1.6.6.1)。