Mansel Robert E, Fallowfield Lesley, Kissin Mark, Goyal Amit, Newcombe Robert G, Dixon J Michael, Yiangou Constantinos, Horgan Kieran, Bundred Nigel, Monypenny Ian, England David, Sibbering Mark, Abdullah Tholkifl I, Barr Lester, Chetty Utheshtra, Sinnett Dudley H, Fleissig Anne, Clarke Dayalan, Ell Peter J
Department of Surgery, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 May 3;98(9):599-609. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djj158.
Sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with operable breast cancer is routinely used in some countries for staging the axilla despite limited data from randomized trials on morbidity and mortality outcomes. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to compare quality-of-life outcomes between patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer who received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received standard axillary treatment.
The primary outcome measures were arm and shoulder morbidity and quality of life. From November 1999 to October 2003, 1031 patients were randomly assigned to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (n = 515) or standard axillary surgery (n = 516). Patients with sentinel lymph node metastases proceeded to delayed axillary clearance or received axillary radiotherapy (depending on the protocol at the treating institution). Intention-to-treat analyses of data at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery are presented. All statistical tests were two-sided.
The relative risks of any lymphedema and sensory loss for the sentinel lymph node biopsy group compared with the standard axillary treatment group at 12 months were 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.60; absolute rates: 5% versus 13%) and 0.37 (95% CI = 0.27 to 0.50; absolute rates: 11% versus 31%), respectively. Drain usage, length of hospital stay, and time to resumption of normal day-to-day activities after surgery were statistically significantly lower in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (all P < .001), and axillary operative time was reduced (P = .055). Overall patient-recorded quality of life and arm functioning scores were statistically significantly better in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group throughout (all P < or = .003). These benefits were seen with no increase in anxiety levels in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (P > .05).
Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with reduced arm morbidity and better quality of life than standard axillary treatment and should be the treatment of choice for patients who have early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative nodes.
在一些国家,可手术乳腺癌女性患者的前哨淋巴结活检常用于腋窝分期,尽管关于发病率和死亡率结果的随机试验数据有限。我们进行了一项多中心随机试验,比较接受前哨淋巴结活检的临床腋窝淋巴结阴性浸润性乳腺癌患者与接受标准腋窝治疗的患者的生活质量结果。
主要结局指标为手臂和肩部发病率及生活质量。1999年11月至2003年10月,1031例患者被随机分配接受前哨淋巴结活检(n = 515)或标准腋窝手术(n = 516)。前哨淋巴结转移的患者继续进行延迟腋窝清扫或接受腋窝放疗(取决于治疗机构的方案)。呈现术后1、3、6和12个月数据的意向性分析。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
与标准腋窝治疗组相比,前哨淋巴结活检组在12个月时任何淋巴水肿和感觉丧失的相对风险分别为0.37(95%置信区间[CI]=0.23至0.60;绝对发生率:5%对13%)和0.37(95%CI = 0.27至0.50;绝对发生率:11%对31%)。前哨淋巴结活检组的引流使用、住院时间和术后恢复正常日常活动的时间在统计学上显著更低(均P <.001),且腋窝手术时间缩短(P = 0.055)。在前哨淋巴结活检组中,总体患者记录的生活质量和手臂功能评分在整个过程中在统计学上显著更好(均P ≤.003)。在前哨淋巴结活检组中未观察到焦虑水平增加(P >.05)的情况下出现了这些益处。
与标准腋窝治疗相比,前哨淋巴结活检与手臂发病率降低和生活质量改善相关,应成为临床腋窝淋巴结阴性的早期乳腺癌患者的首选治疗方法。