物理治疗师对符合临床预测规则的患者使用腰椎推拿技术:病例系列

The use of a lumbar spine manipulation technique by physical therapists in patients who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a case series.

作者信息

Cleland Joshua A, Fritz Julie M, Whitman Julie M, Childs John D, Palmer Jessica A

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, Franklin Pierce College, Concord, NH 03301, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 Apr;36(4):209-14. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.36.4.209.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A case series of patients with low back pain (LBP) who satisfy a clinical prediction rule (CPR).

BACKGROUND

A CPR that identifies patients with LBP who are likely to respond with rapid and prolonged reductions in pain and disability following spinal manipulation was developed and recently validated. The CPR developed to predict favorable response to manipulation investigated the effects of only 1 manipulation technique. The accuracy of the CPR for predicting outcomes using other manipulation techniques is not known. The purpose of the case series was to describe the outcomes of patients presenting to physical therapy with LBP who met the CPR and were treated with an alternative lumbar manipulation technique.

CASE DESCRIPTION

Consecutive patients referred to physical therapy who satisfied the eligibility criteria, including the presence of at least 4 of the 5 criteria on the CPR, were invited to participate in the case series. Patients were treated for 2 visits with a side-lying lumbar manipulation technique, followed by a basic range of motion exercise. Patients who exhibited a 50% reduction or greater in disability, as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were considered to have experienced a successful outcome.

OUTCOMES

A total of 12 patients participated in the case series. The mean age of the group was 39 years (SD, 8.9 years) and the median duration of symptoms was 19 days (range, 8-148 days). Of the 12 patients who participated in this case series, the mean reduction in disability as measured with the ODI was 57% (SD, 9%). Only 1 patient did not surpass the 50% reduction in ODI scores.

DISCUSSION

Eleven of the 12 patients (92%) in this case series who satisfied the CPR and were treated with an alternative lumbar manipulation technique demonstrated a successful outcome in 2 visits. It is plausible that patients with LBP who satisfy the CPR may obtain a successful outcome with either manipulation technique directed at the lumbopelvic region.

摘要

研究设计

一组符合临床预测规则(CPR)的腰痛(LBP)患者病例系列。

背景

一种用于识别可能在脊柱推拿后疼痛和残疾迅速且长期减轻的LBP患者的CPR已被开发并于近期得到验证。用于预测推拿良好反应的CPR仅研究了1种推拿技术的效果。使用其他推拿技术时该CPR预测结果的准确性尚不清楚。该病例系列的目的是描述符合CPR并接受另一种腰椎推拿技术治疗的LBP患者接受物理治疗后的结果。

病例描述

连续被转介至物理治疗的符合入选标准的患者,包括满足CPR上5项标准中的至少4项,被邀请参加该病例系列。患者接受2次侧卧腰椎推拿技术治疗,随后进行基本的关节活动度练习。通过Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)测量,残疾程度降低50%或更多的患者被认为取得了成功的治疗结果。

结果

共有12名患者参加了该病例系列。该组患者的平均年龄为39岁(标准差,8.9岁),症状的中位持续时间为19天(范围,8 - 148天)。在参加该病例系列的12名患者中,用ODI测量的残疾程度平均降低了57%(标准差,9%)。只有1名患者的ODI评分未超过降低50%。

讨论

该病例系列中12名满足CPR并接受另一种腰椎推拿技术治疗的患者中有11名(92%)在2次就诊后取得了成功的治疗结果。符合CPR的LBP患者采用针对腰骶部区域的任何一种推拿技术都可能获得成功的治疗结果,这似乎是合理的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索